Improve how to punish guilty players versus injuried players

[Eric Jego]

Hi everybody !

Thank you for pointing me how strange can be such a proposal. Yes you are right, referees don't see everytime everything. But :

- when he says "penalty" and is seeing a player with broken leg due to the fault, real life makes sense to decide for a red card. I saw in my top eleven games it is not always the case, nor a yellow card for the same case. Top eleven should go this way each time.

- when there is a red card, there is automatically 1 match banned in Top Eleven. Ok for this. In the real life (in France for professional footballers... I don't know for other countries) there is then a commission to analyse the situation (both for yellow and red cards) and to decide the final suspension to applicate. It make sense... Sometimes it is confirmed for 1 match, sometimes it is up-graded depending the situation.

- Now maybe the needed action to do for Nordeus is to think about the "too much" lot of injuries, which seems to be enormous ! And if... may be thinking about these two ways and improve my suggestion and their system of injuried players should be the right way.

And Keat, I am not sure to understand well your last sentence. Did you mean Top Eleven should ban 2 matches for a red card... or is banning 2 matches when a red card is given ? I got some red cards and I always had only 1 match banned.

And now I'd like to come back to the french commissions (after referees' punishments). Don't you have such a system in the real life in your own countries ? In France... we have.

Regards