Reduce the minium price for players.

[Buffs Mad]

There should be more flexibility in price setting for TM and a clearer indication of Auction length. I don't see such flexibility as that problematic in the TM as there are fewer potential exploits compared to Negotiations.

[PricopGeorgeCătălin]

There should be more flexibility in price setting for TM and a clearer indication of Auction length. I don't see such flexibility as that problematic in the TM as there are fewer potential exploits compared to Negotiations.

Top Eleven is winning real money from ingame money, the system is created so both sides can win. If everyone will sell his players for a very low amount of money, the game will lose a lot from this.

First of all, the game should win then us because if the game don't win, game over for everyone.

[Buffs Mad]

[QUOTE=PricopGeorgeCătălin;351306]Top Eleven is winning real money from ingame money, the system is created so both sides can win. If everyone will sell his players for a very low amount of money, the game will lose a lot from this.

Why would everyone sell for low prices? You lower when you can't sell. Consistently lower prices is a theoretical possibility that would not be supported by the human condition imo.

Just because there would be an option to lower price does not mean there would be lower transactions and an impact on Bank Loans.

[Tactician]

Top Eleven is winning real money from ingame money, the system is created so both sides can win. If everyone will sell his players for a very low amount of money, the game will lose a lot from this.

First of all, the game should win then us because if the game don't win, game over for everyone.

A lower price makes the player more attractive and also more users will able to bid for the player (virtual money restriction), and hence more tokens will be spent.