Formulas for a better league draw- Share your opinion -

[nikolgiorgos]

The previous (random) system was ok.
My good mix is 4-5 active good teams, 4-5 medium teams (but able to do "damage" in some games) and 4-5 low q teams but not abandoned. Those teams with 33 y.o. players, playing in random positions, crippling players, giving domination in some teams or just a typical 3-0 to others must stay in the fridge or in a league strictly with those teams.
I don't understand (or don't want to be to suspicious ) why they change the league system.
The complains about the league was very few while all the managers are complaining about the Cup draw.

[cookizzz]

Leagues consisting of abandoned teams only are not appropriate because the first four will be in the Champions League next season.

Such league is really meaningless. However, I don't think it is easy to confirm if a team is abandoned at season beginning. As long as the teams have been managed within about 30 days (I forgot the exact period) at the season beginning, they should still be considered as active team. If they became abandoned within the season, they could not be kicked out of those leagues.

I agree that those weak leagues comprising of abandon teams is a problem for drawing similar quality team together. That's why I prefer pure random drawing over this method.

The previous (random) system was ok.
My good mix is 4-5 active good teams, 4-5 medium teams (but able to do "damage" in some games) and 4-5 low q teams but not abandoned. Those teams with 33 y.o. players, playing in random positions, crippling players, giving domination in some teams or just a typical 3-0 to others must stay in the fridge or in a league strictly with those teams.
I don't understand (or don't want to be to suspicious ) why they change the league system.
The complains about the league was very few while all the managers are complaining about the Cup draw.

As I remember, league drawing was basically random but friends are tended to be group together in same league. There were some managers complaining that their leagues comprised of teams stronger than the others. Because of grouping of friends together, average qualities of some leagues are higher than the others, and I heard a few complaints about unfair league drawing. I could not remember any manager expressed desire to group similar quality teams in the same league. Probably some managers did but I did not note this. Otherwise, it should be the decision of Nordeus to make leagues with more severe competition so as to stimulate use of tokens.

Personally, I accept different methods of drawings so far I noticed. I just hope league prize or sponsorship will reflect average qualities of the league to make the arrangement fairer.