Power ranking of manager

[VanDoom]

Hi
I have a suggestion to increase the competitiveness of the game:
To introduce power ranking of the manager similar to that of association games
the managers can be ranked in their respective levels in the global server taking to account (Different weight-age):

1) Trophies won in past seasons
2) Strength of current squad
3) Match won/ lose
4) Goals scored (Current season)
5) Goals conceded
6) Financial status
7) Value of assets
8) Number of friends
9) Numbers of association games won
10) Number of association goals scored/conceded
11) Number of achievement attained
12) Top Scorers/ Top assist/ Top rated players in league

The update of the ranking can be updated on weekly basis

Thanks

[LeManiaque]

8-11 seem irrelevant, the rest seem likely factors for deciding the 'fan base' stat in the old version. I'm in favor of more stats, especially showcasing #12, league toppers.

My question:
Does the game need to be more competitive? And if so, why is a global ranking the way to do it?
With millions of players, even just thousands per level, especially lower ones, doesn't that number become irrelevant really fast?
How often will a non-paying player want to check how many token buyers are "better" than them? I feel I couldn't gain anything with such a simple number, at least not of value beyond comparing value, fan base, team quality as they are presently shared.


Btw, if you're just dreaming up suggestions, don't you want the list to update real time? Dream optimally, friend.

[nikolgiorgos]

ranking, numbers, stats, records are good
memory is not enough

[Gert Funck]

I want my best player ranking back... please with sugar on the top

[cookizzz]

Data relating to association games are from another world and should be excluded. (There is another world ranking, isn't it?)

Current level of clubs, players, and the levels of competition trophies obtained should be considered. It may be easier to rank managers of same club (league) level.

No. of tokens /packs may also be considered as it affects potential competitiveness.

[VanDoom]

Hi @LeManiaque @nikolgiorgos
no 8-11 is purely to increase the particpation of the managers
My idea is that of a points system that no stat needs to be kept in the ranking system
Weekly update is to keep the data low for mobile user

the points system can be worked like this
1) Trophies won in past seasons ---- 200 points awarded for each trophies won
2) Strength of current squad--- 50 points for 4 star team, 100 points for 5 star team.. etc (update every season)
3) Match won/ lose (+5/-5 points for each match won/lose)
4) Goals scored (Current season) (+1 for each goal score)
5) Goals conceded (-1 for each goal conceded)
6) Financial status (2 points for every million in the budget)
7) Value of assets (2 points for each level of asset)
8) Number of friends (0.5 points for each friend)
9) Numbers of association games won (0.5 points for each game won)
10) Number of association goals scored/conceded (0.2 for each goals scored)
11) Number of achievement attained (10 points for each achievement obtained)
12) Top Scorers/ Top assist/ Top rated players in league (20 points for each rated)

Such that the ranking table has no stat but just number example, similar to assoc table
managers can play friendly with each other without adding as friend

League level 40 ( Top 50)
Rank
1. Manager A----- 4000 points (Play Friendly) (Friendly won: 10)
2. Manager B----- 3990 points (Play Friendly) (Friendly won: 6)
3. Manager C----- 2000 points (Play Friendly) (Friendly won: 15)
4. Manager D----- 1990 points (Play Friendly) (Friendly won: 2)

League level 39 ( Top 50)
Rank
1. Manager A1----- 3000 points (Play Friendly) (Friendly won: 10)
2. Manager B1----- 2990 points (Play Friendly) (Friendly won: 6)
3. Manager C1----- 1000 points (Play Friendly) (Friendly won: 15)
4. Manager D1----- 990 points (Play Friendly) (Friendly won: 2)