The whole question is flawed, I saw this earlier and just didn't respond because the OP was PMing me for an answer to a question I already answered on a post he had made

But now others are commenting, and the answers aren't helpful in case anyone else hits this thread (excuse me rds, you had a decent attempt)

The question betrays a lack of understanding about the game. Zonal and MTM are both effective, depending on certain factors

The main one is formation - if you go MTM and you have three defenders, but your opponent has two forwards and 3 AM then your defence will be overwhelmed

Also, quality matters - if your worst defender is 1v1 with your opponent's best attacker, then you'll probably concede goals

I go zonal because, frankly, I'm too lazy to change formation and tactics to counter my opponent, plus I believe in playing to your strengths rather than trying to block your opponent