Results 1 to 10 of 62
Like Tree14Likes

Thread: is this dumb or what?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    430
    hrgamrga, its a basic 4-5-1 formation with 2 advance wingers and 3 midfielders playing across the middle.

    my point is that the current limitations and specifications that determine an illegal formation should be redone as there are formations that people want to use that are technically not illegal in the real game of football.

    1) they need to lower the amount of actual illegal formations and,
    2) need to penalize the illegal formation team more.

    what is the point of playing against an illegal formation and worrying that they might actually win??? some people play illegal formations by accident as they dont know the rules (wonder why that happens...have you seen a rulebook/wiki that is confirmed by Nordeus?) some people play them on purpose (guilty as charged) to tank or to help others win the league. if someone plays a completey stupid illegal formation instead of the formidable one I uses, it should be a guaranteed loss. example, playing 4 players on each side leaving the middle of the field open should be a 6-0 win at the least, no matter the strength of the teams. and for those who dont understand that...



    this formation should be a 99-100% loss by more than one goal.

  2. #2
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Zadar, Hrvatska
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
    hrgamrga, its a basic 4-5-1 formation with 2 advance wingers and 3 midfielders playing across the middle.
    If there are three midfielders playing across the middle, then there should be three players playing the position of MC (DMC and AMC are valid options too). If you got an ML and an MR, they'll just keep playing on their positions.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    430
    so what if they are not central midfielders, they are left and right midfielders, or some call wingers. so I have wingers and advance wingers, there should be no issues with that.

  4. #4
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Zadar, Hrvatska
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
    so what if they are not central midfielders, they are left and right midfielders, or some call wingers. so I have wingers and advance wingers, there should be no issues with that.
    Yeah, and do you see any logic in it being a legal formation? Four wingers and advanced wingers on the field, there's no logic explanation why that would be a legal formation.

  5. #5
    Champion Saransh Vatsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Milky Way
    Posts
    2,814
    Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
    this formation should be a 99-100% loss by more than one goal.
    So will be said but when the team is trying to lose, that rare 1% chance of winning will always crop up!!!!


    Should Kaka' have been selected for Brazil's WC squad?
    Tell us ur opinion-

    http://forum.topeleven.com/football-...-new-post.html

    P.S.S The person in my avatar is NOT me! He is the God of Cricket, Sachin Tendulkar.

  6. #6
    Rookie masyaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Saransh Vatsa View Post
    So will be said but when the team is trying to lose, that rare 1% chance of winning will always crop up!!!!
    Too many 1% win chance are happening against me. For example now I played against 16.7* team with my 30.5* home match and won only 2-0, every trying of my STs (more then 30* in quality) was blocked by 1* players. And this is heppening almost every second match. It is not 1%. It is 30% chance to loose against much much weaker teams.