Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 62
Like Tree14Likes

Thread: is this dumb or what?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    430

    is this dumb or what?

    wow, I trolled someone. trying to tank, thanks to Mark Symons inspirational presence and thinking I have this game tanked, I almost won. Had 50% in all my players condition and was morally bankrupt so to speak, played an illegal formation (which should not be illegal, but what the hell) and instructions that should increase the chance to lose.

    on top of that, I lost 3 players to red cards in the first half alone and still only lost 0-1 to my opponent while playing my second string players. I admit I could have played an illegal formation with less strength but everything else should have been taken into account to give me a bigger loss.









    think about it: he has 3 - THREE!!! penalties and only scores one!!! and I dont have a penalty specialist. and he plays the whole second half with a 3 man advantage. I lose 2 defenders and its still only 1 goal against me.

    If this game were simulated in real life, there is no possibility that I would lose with only one goal against. but to have 3 red cards in a game is just stupid. but to have 3 red cards in a game and lose only 0-1 and the opponent missing 2 penalties is just even stupider.

    wake up nordeus.


    edit. how the hell can my formation be illegal in the first place. this illegal formation thing needs a serious revamp and it needs to be almost an automatic loss when someone plays an illegal formation. yes I know you cant have 3 players on the wings, but i did that on purpose to give the guy his 80% possession.
    littledude072 likes this.

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    33
    Dat random match engine. You must love it when you throw money into ti. Its like betting.

  3. #3
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Zadar, Hrvatska
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
    played an illegal formation (which should not be illegal, but what the hell)...
    Good it's illegal, it clashes with everything we know about football. How can anyone play with DL, ML and AML (and same on the right side of the field) and expect it to be legal? Rubbish.
    Med78 likes this.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    430
    hrgamrga, its a basic 4-5-1 formation with 2 advance wingers and 3 midfielders playing across the middle.

    my point is that the current limitations and specifications that determine an illegal formation should be redone as there are formations that people want to use that are technically not illegal in the real game of football.

    1) they need to lower the amount of actual illegal formations and,
    2) need to penalize the illegal formation team more.

    what is the point of playing against an illegal formation and worrying that they might actually win??? some people play illegal formations by accident as they dont know the rules (wonder why that happens...have you seen a rulebook/wiki that is confirmed by Nordeus?) some people play them on purpose (guilty as charged) to tank or to help others win the league. if someone plays a completey stupid illegal formation instead of the formidable one I uses, it should be a guaranteed loss. example, playing 4 players on each side leaving the middle of the field open should be a 6-0 win at the least, no matter the strength of the teams. and for those who dont understand that...



    this formation should be a 99-100% loss by more than one goal.

  5. #5
    Pro littledude072's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Hiigara
    Posts
    929
    they should just remove the 'illegal formations'. weve seen countless times where legals lost. if i were that dude id be ranting about you right now. hell in fifa i play with no fronts when i want to defend
    if they want to keep the illegals, might as well nerf the counters and 'X shoots from distance'. thats how most illegals score
    Cat Harrison likes this.
    take my posts with a sack of salt
    Click here to buy your sack of salt! Buy one get a ***load!, free! Free shipping and handling on and off planet!

    i am the fonz | je suis le fonz | saya adalah sang fonz
    fluent with these languages and can understand 3 more
    Click here to learn a new language, absolutely free!

    The inbeatable, indefeated, unvincible duet - Goonskies - Rags to Riches!
    kudos to cat

  6. #6
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Zadar, Hrvatska
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
    hrgamrga, its a basic 4-5-1 formation with 2 advance wingers and 3 midfielders playing across the middle.
    If there are three midfielders playing across the middle, then there should be three players playing the position of MC (DMC and AMC are valid options too). If you got an ML and an MR, they'll just keep playing on their positions.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    430
    so what if they are not central midfielders, they are left and right midfielders, or some call wingers. so I have wingers and advance wingers, there should be no issues with that.

  8. #8
    Champion Saransh Vatsa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Milky Way
    Posts
    2,814
    Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
    this formation should be a 99-100% loss by more than one goal.
    So will be said but when the team is trying to lose, that rare 1% chance of winning will always crop up!!!!


    Should Kaka' have been selected for Brazil's WC squad?
    Tell us ur opinion-

    http://forum.topeleven.com/football-...-new-post.html

    P.S.S The person in my avatar is NOT me! He is the God of Cricket, Sachin Tendulkar.

  9. #9
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Zadar, Hrvatska
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by rastaman70 View Post
    so what if they are not central midfielders, they are left and right midfielders, or some call wingers. so I have wingers and advance wingers, there should be no issues with that.
    Yeah, and do you see any logic in it being a legal formation? Four wingers and advanced wingers on the field, there's no logic explanation why that would be a legal formation.

  10. #10
    Rookie masyaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Saransh Vatsa View Post
    So will be said but when the team is trying to lose, that rare 1% chance of winning will always crop up!!!!
    Too many 1% win chance are happening against me. For example now I played against 16.7* team with my 30.5* home match and won only 2-0, every trying of my STs (more then 30* in quality) was blocked by 1* players. And this is heppening almost every second match. It is not 1%. It is 30% chance to loose against much much weaker teams.

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast