Re: Anyone can explain this to me??? Thanks and Im really really appriciated..

[Qambu Yaasi]

I cant explain the goal & shot efficiency but my best guess is a calculation lag. Have u noticed that a team sometimes scores 2 but the shot efficiency is still shown as 1 on target and 200% efficiency? After a while it is corrected and it shows 2 on target and 100% efficiency. So I guess the game stopped before the count is corrected.

I am not defending nordeus but just trying to provide the best logical explanation i can think off to what happen and at the same time, this also highlights the programming error.

As for red cards...it has nothing to do with Hard tackling, you can set easy and still get a red as the type of tackling is actually referring to how frequent you get tackles in, not how malicious your tackles are. Being non-english speaking company, Im sure they could not find a better word to put it. Should be renamed to "stand-off", "normal", "frequent"

It shouldn't bug you that he has 167% shot efficiency, it should bug you more that he is creating more chances than you and your midfield is not helping in attack & defense. That's how I see it and that's how I avoid having sleepless nights over cosmetic errors

[Brian Dang]

I cant explain the goal & shot efficiency but my best guess is a calculation lag. Have u noticed that a team sometimes scores 2 but the shot efficiency is still shown as 1 on target and 200% efficiency? After a while it is corrected and it shows 2 on target and 100% efficiency. So I guess the game stopped before the count is corrected.

I am not defending nordeus but just trying to provide the best logical explanation i can think off to what happen and at the same time, this also highlights the programming error.

As for red cards...it has nothing to do with Hard tackling, you can set easy and still get a red as the type of tackling is actually referring to how frequent you get tackles in, not how malicious your tackles are. Being non-english speaking company, Im sure they could not find a better word to put it. Should be renamed to "stand-off", "normal", "frequent"

It shouldn't bug you that he has 167% shot efficiency, it should bug you more that he is creating more chances than you and your midfield is not helping in attack & defense. That's how I see it and that's how I avoid having sleepless nights over cosmetic errors

Yes..I think your explanation is very logic.. anyway...I think I got my answer and just accept this defeat since it's program n I'm get used to it.I meant funny results n troll n whatever we call them..keep moving then...I want to know this season I will be in which position after so much incidents...as you can see from other thread...
Thanks...

[Qambu Yaasi]

Yes..I think your explanation is very logic.. anyway...I think I got my answer and just accept this defeat since it's program n I'm get used to it.I meant funny result..keep moving then...I want to know this season I will be in which position after so much incidents...as you can see from other thread...
Thanks...

Im sure you'll finish top 3....if not I'll chop the balls of one of my star strikers and tank a season...

[Brian Dang]

Im sure you'll finish top 3....if not I'll chop the balls of one of my star strikers and tank a season...

Now is my current situation for 2 teams:

Winning 11:
In cup ...Fighting for a place in quarter final...This season so far I'm doing pretty well.. Defeated all teams at Level 8/9 all the way up to this 1/16.. but not sure how far I can go coz the deeper the more stronger they are ...just wish to reach more than quarter final.. better a bit than last year only...

In CL

And In the League


TUAN DM FC:
In CUP..OUT..LOST TO LEVEL 8 TOO STRONG..LAST YEAR I GOT INTO QUATER FINAL...HUHUHU
IN CL