Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23
Like Tree17Likes

Thread: Ratings vs Star Quality

  1. #1
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    262

    Ratings vs Star Quality

    Have seen a few posts here about the ratings of 1* players and how they seem to perform...however, would a rating of 9 for a 1* be comparable to a 5 for a 5*?

    Just wondering how it works...

  2. #2
    Pro Gintaras Račas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    901
    Whaaaaaaaaaaaat? Never heard about this, where did you get this from? Ratings are same for everyone, no?
    Philip L. Willis likes this.
    Not so many achievements:

    Season(lvl) League Champions l. Cup
    1(1) 1st - Prel.
    2(2) 1st 3rd Top 16
    3(3) 1st Top 16 Playoffs
    4(4) tbc. tbc. Playoffs
    Team's showcase: The PaceWhores (Lithuanian team)

  3. #3
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by Gintaras Račas View Post
    Whaaaaaaaaaaaat? Never heard about this, where did you get this from? Ratings are same for everyone, no?
    I didn't get it from anywhere, to be fair. In my head, that's just how it works! Given that a 5* is of a higher standard than a 1*, the 1* needs to do less to qualify a rating...

    I suspect there's no actual data to prove it one way or the other.

  4. #4
    Pro Gintaras Račas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    901
    Quote Originally Posted by russ2000_uk View Post
    I didn't get it from anywhere, to be fair. In my head, that's just how it works! Given that a 5* is of a higher standard than a 1*, the 1* needs to do less to qualify a rating...

    I suspect there's no actual data to prove it one way or the other.
    Sorry, but that's absolutely NOT how ratings work
    Philip L. Willis likes this.
    Not so many achievements:

    Season(lvl) League Champions l. Cup
    1(1) 1st - Prel.
    2(2) 1st 3rd Top 16
    3(3) 1st Top 16 Playoffs
    4(4) tbc. tbc. Playoffs
    Team's showcase: The PaceWhores (Lithuanian team)

  5. #5
    VIP Buffs Mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,268
    If ratings are purely personal then yes a 1* could get a 7 for tying his boots, 8 if its a very neat bow. The 7* player would need to beat 10 players, finish with a bicycle kick, all the while correctly explaining string theory and whistling Dixie.

    I don't think so. Its probably more like +marks for good things and -marks for bad things / the number of people using the Nordeus toilets at lunchtime x the number of times the Nordeus dog licks his nuts + any random number that gives a result between 0 and 10.

    PS. If you amended your hypothesis to suggest that in generating ratings there might be a coefficient/multiplier applied based on quality - which means that if a 1* and 7* player did exactly the same things in the same match then the 1* might get a slightly higher rating - then there might be merit in that.
    Last edited by Buffs Mad; 07-27-2014 at 09:36 PM. Reason: enboldened

  6. #6
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by Gintaras Račas View Post
    Sorry, but that's absolutely NOT how ratings work
    Sorry, but you don't know that.

    Let's say that, for example, a player rated 100 has an in-engine points score for everything positive they do in a match, which is used to determine their rating. They have a cap, let's assume it's 100 for the sake of simplicity. Every pass they make gives them 10 points for example, a goal is 20 points, a red card -10, or whatever it might be. The points would need to increase with the level, so level 15 they get 10 points for pass, level 16 they get 11. There could be brackets that equate to ratings, for example, 91-100 is a 9, 81-90 is an 8, etc.

    Let's further postulate that a player with a rating of 70 has a cap of 70. It's much easier for him to get to the bracket for a 9 rating as he scores higher points because he plays at a higher level.

    If you have any evidence to the contrary, happy to have my theory refuted...

  7. #7
    Pro Gintaras Račas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    901
    I don't have evidence YET. The season has just started our team played 1 match, no suitable example in there.
    Not so many achievements:

    Season(lvl) League Champions l. Cup
    1(1) 1st - Prel.
    2(2) 1st 3rd Top 16
    3(3) 1st Top 16 Playoffs
    4(4) tbc. tbc. Playoffs
    Team's showcase: The PaceWhores (Lithuanian team)

  8. #8
    Famous BeckStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,226
    my players usually perform bad when i get drunk or eat too much chocolate..:| anyone else?^^

    My team:http://www.topeleven.com/manager/p/B...AwNTYwNzM1MTQw
    Road to the Treble & How to win the Cup: http://forum.topeleven.com/tutorials...xt-season.html
    Top 10 Formations & Tactics Guide:http://forum.topeleven.com/tutorials...ics-guide.html
    Those guides are based on my personal experience and other managers suggestion/feedback

  9. #9
    Apprentice IGOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    157
    Quote Originally Posted by russ2000_uk View Post
    Have seen a few posts here about the ratings of 1* players and how they seem to perform...however, would a rating of 9 for a 1* be comparable to a 5 for a 5*?

    Just wondering how it works...
    Make sure that all players are equal with their stars (4*-5*). I usually do this just to my first squad. The ratings are just temporary

    Server: 107 Team: FC Vardar

  10. #10
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,063
    I think ratings are related to how often a player interacts with the ball, regardless of stars.
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast