This game lacks reward for dedicated players

[Blisterecon]

I have 10+ stars than my opponnent, Im losing by 0-1 and still i cant barely score a single goal for my last league match where i needed to win to win the league! It went 1-1 so i finished 2nd.

I watch every single match, and i didnt deserve this. I am extremely frustrated because im dedicated while other managers win the league even thought they watch like 10% of the games.

I deserved to win the league! I had more stars than all, I played consistently all league! Why do I have to draw vs a team with 10 less starts than mine!? No point being dedicated as I am... I dont want token for logins or watch the games, If i am an active user, give me f****ng justice at least!

[Amane Ito]

Because you were blinded by the information the game given, and failed to understand how the game worked. 1 star difference can be easily overcame by proper player management and correct tactics.

I have a lower quality team than half of the people in my league and ends in 2nd at level 23. I rarely attend my games and actually beat the league winner on the last game of the league for 1:0 where I didn't even watched it (although I'm still 5 points short).

My players are outperforming for their quality, and this is achieved by proper management.

You can only play better though learning not complaining. But yeah, it could be frustrating at times.

[Blisterecon]

I manage my players everyday, I train my players everyday considering their physical condition, i boost moral and phisics...
My tactic is correct, i dont use illegal ones ofc. Just because he had lets say a better tactic than mine he can draw with me even though he is 10 stars short?
Whats the point having better players then! I wasnt blinded by nothing, i deserved to win this league clearly

[Amane Ito]

I manage my players everyday, I train my players everyday considering their physical condition, i boost moral and phisics...
My tactic is correct, i dont use illegal ones ofc. Just because he had lets say a better tactic than mine he can draw with me even though he is 10 stars short?
Whats the point having better players then! I wasnt blinded by nothing, i deserved to win this league clearly

If both sides use the correct tactics, an average 10q higher team would more likely win. I'd say something like 95% or 18 in 20 games.

The quality advantage is much less than you would like. When you have many players getting form 6 or lower, you are not managing your team well enough to ensure domination.
Morale is not much of a factor for player performance. In fact, the natual change in morale after match is an indication of player fitness.

Don't judge players solely on the stars, but by their overall pitch performance.

If you think a higher quality team should always win you've vastly underestimated the complexity of the game and I don't think you are so "dedicated" as you claimed. You may have tried your best but it didn't work as you thought, the situation won't improve unless you find your decision errors and correct them.


Tip: Bench or fire the worst performing player in the last 5 games, and find someone else to replace him, no matter the quality, one at the time. Repeat the process you will eventually have a top eleven of motivated and powerful players that is very difficult to beat. RL regular lineup is pretty much the same thing, really.

[Dmitry Petrushkevich]

Because you were blinded by the information the game given, and failed to understand how the game worked. 1 star difference can be easily overcame by proper player management and correct tactics.

I have a lower quality team than half of the people in my league and ends in 2nd at level 23. I rarely attend my games and actually beat the league winner on the last game of the league for 1:0 where I didn't even watched it (although I'm still 5 points short).

My players are outperforming for their quality, and this is achieved by proper management.

You can only play better though learning not complaining. But yeah, it could be frustrating at times.

Seriously? Cause my buddy who just quit the game thinks differently. His league champion hasn't attended a single game, hasn't substituted a single player, hasn't changed formation even once all season long. I'm not sure if he ever assigned a skill point, cause he won the league this way with his 5* players while other manager were trying to improve their teams and had 6* and 7* players.
And looks like in every league weaker teams has won all the last games last season (at least 6 teams that managed by friends of mine couldn't win a game). Probably all the "proper managers" don't watch their games and got weaker teams.

[Blisterecon]

Seriously? Cause my buddy who just quit the game thinks differently. His league champion hasn't attended a single game, hasn't substituted a single player, hasn't changed formation even once all season long. I'm not sure if he ever assigned a skill point, cause he won the league this way with his 5* players while other manager were trying to improve their teams and had 6* and 7* players.
And looks like in every league weaker teams has won all the last games last season (at least 6 teams that managed by friends of mine couldn't win a game). Probably all the "proper managers" don't watch their games and got weaker teams.

That's what I am talking about!!

[Amane Ito]

Seriously? Cause my buddy who just quit the game thinks differently. His league champion hasn't attended a single game, hasn't substituted a single player, hasn't changed formation even once all season long. I'm not sure if he ever assigned a skill point, cause he won the league this way with his 5* players while other manager were trying to improve their teams and had 6* and 7* players.
And looks like in every league weaker teams has won all the last games last season (at least 6 teams that managed by friends of mine couldn't win a game). Probably all the "proper managers" don't watch their games and got weaker teams.

Sorry but yes, that 5* team is stronger than your 6~7* layman teams, due to proper player selection. His players are simply better and it's not about the stars.

I have done that before, winning league with a team of 4~5* while at least 4 managers in the league had 5~6* teams. We won because we managed better and optimally changed the tactics against different teams and they did not. You don't know which option is better against what team, but we did our research thus know how to change the orders to improve the chances way before a game has started.

When he consistently dominate using a low quality team, match a same quality team and there will be no game. Many people here had 26-0-0 run before, using full 5* team with a scout or two.
I can win around 80% of the games against same quality random team, without watching the game and have no manager supporting on my side.

We are just playing at a much higher skill level, novice with more stars alone have little chance against us.
But you can always buy your way to victory. A 3 star average difference is insurmountable unless the lower quality team got extremely lucky.

Using the optimal counter, I think the chance for me against a 2 star deficit is pretty much 50/50. If it is only 1 star, I could win more games than losing. I found out most often the reason I lost a game on 1 star deficit was because I carelessly employed the wrong orders.

How dedicated are you?

[Dmitry Petrushkevich]

Sorry but yes, that 5* team is stronger than your 6~7* layman teams, due to proper player selection. His players are simply better and it's not about the stars.

I have done that before, winning league with a team of 4~5* while at least 4 managers in the league had 5~6* teams. We won because we managed better and optimally changed the tactics against different teams and they did not. You don't know which option is better against what team, but we did our research thus know how to change the orders to improve the chances way before a game has started.

When he consistently dominate using a low quality team, match a same quality team and there will be no game. Many people here had 26-0-0 run before, using full 5* team with a scout or two.
I can win around 80% of the games against same quality random team, without watching the game and have no manager supporting on my side.

We are just playing at a much higher skill level, novice with more stars alone have little chance against us.
But you can always buy your way to victory. A 3 star average difference is insurmountable unless the lower quality team got extremely lucky.

Using the optimal counter, I think the chance for me against a 2 star deficit is pretty much 50/50. If it is only 1 star, I could win more games than losing. I found out most often the reason I lost a game on 1 star deficit was because I carelessly employed the wrong orders.

How dedicated are you?

You have no idea what you're talking about. Which is common for the Nordeus fans.
My buddy's team has won both Cup and Champions league last season. He dumped all his players except starting 11, changed their names, spent all his token on jerseys and left this game, but even after that his team is undefeated this season! I'm taking a look at sometimes and they refuse to lose even without any support. They won 3 rounds of the Cup against the teams one or two levels higher, they've won all their CL games... This team is playing better without manager than it used to play when someone was taking care of them! And I have to mention that in the head-to-head game my buddy's team beat that "champion" 4:0. That's crazy results in the other games didn't allow him to with the treble - he was able to get only 1 point in the last 2 games of the season against buttom feeders! He knows about this game as much as anyone else including yourself, but a bunch of unpredictable results decided everything.
And you contradicting yourself in every sentence.
You say: "We won because we managed better and optimally changed", but the champion of my buddy's league didn't manage his team! Did you miss the part about substitutions, changing formation and presence at the games?
You said that the OP blinded by the information the game given, and failed to understand how the game worked, but I really doubt that you understand it yourself.

[shahaf22]

Blisterecon - the answer is very simple.
nordeus simply dont care about there managers (us) they dont care about there game if its fair or not, they dont care if you attended your match or not, all they care is to make $$$$$$$$$$ from comersials and sponsers and token sell. as long as their pocket is full they dont care about anything.

[Blisterecon]

Thats what I am realizing...