Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
Like Tree18Likes

Thread: This game lacks reward for dedicated players

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    4
    I have similar issue. Can't win cup. Cannot even pass through the quallifying stage. I regulary loose against worst squads that dont even have players signed, (their formation is invisible) or goalkeeper is playing on strikers position, striker is on the goal etc. I have won more than 15 leagues, 1 champions cup ( + 5 finals that i loose), but cannot pass through the cup quallifiers. My altered team have won 3 world cups and i didnt even paid attention to the team, players, moral,haelth, formation...etc. HOW???

  2. #2
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,062
    @Mamadu...about the Cup, and your alternate winning and main not... that's my experience too. If you have a very nice team, you wind up in a level or more above you in Cup, and it is hard to improve your team to the Q level of the competitors you face, since one token buys them a Scout or better. With a closer to average team, you will be in your own level Cup, thus much easier to win.
    Last edited by Cat Harrison; 03-08-2015 at 04:47 PM.
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #3
    Spanish Forum Moderator khris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    16,358
    +10 stars?

    This game lacks reward for dedicated players-10-stars-moree.jpg

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by khris View Post
    +10 stars?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	10 stars moree.jpg 
Views:	113 
Size:	37.5 KB 
ID:	39791
    thats bull****! stupid game

  5. #5
    Addicted Philip L. Willis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    699
    Quote Originally Posted by khris View Post
    +10 stars?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	10 stars moree.jpg 
Views:	113 
Size:	37.5 KB 
ID:	39791
    The least you can do is line up the stars for goodness sake, I could line them up in PC paint better than that!?
    khris likes this.
    In football it is better to be Lucky than Good.

  6. #6
    Spanish Forum Moderator khris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    16,358
    Quote Originally Posted by Philip L. Willis View Post
    The least you can do is line up the stars for goodness sake, I could line them up in PC paint better than that!?
    LOL yeah... and tthe 6 looks like is a little bit alcoholic too.. but well,,, I still asking the same, 10 stars? or 10 of Quality? ...because 10 of Q. we know all depend of the 22 players that one have... the % can be reduced due 1*-2* and so... and well... too we have to see other stuffs, like level of skills in players, and too a valoration of how posible is to win looking the 2 initiall 11's...

    I know u r a good painter PW, I deal with it LOL

  7. #7
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    426
    Should color the sixth and further stars like the ones in-game and decorate the beyond with a glare of golden shine, with further stars shining brighter
    Cat Harrison likes this.

  8. #8
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    69
    The weaker teams, the abandoned teams, the teams where the manager turns up every now and then. Nor-dues isn't getting any income from these teams. The income comes from the better teams, where managers are trying to improve, get stronger, watch all the games, train, pay attention, etc. etc.
    So when these weaker, abandoned, uncared for teams win, as they are programmed to do....Then the managers who care get pissed, because it's an injustice and a high % will try to improve their team even more, ie. Buy players, tokens, boosters and so forth....When you realise this is JUST a money making exercise, like most cheap ass online games, then you will enjoy it more. It's just a bit of fun, not worth your hard earned cash....Why do you thnk its a FREE gemme....????
    Season 21
    League winners: Season 2,3,4,5,7,8,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,19
    League runner-up: Season 6,9,10,
    Season 13-5th!, 20-4th!
    Champions league: Season 3-3rd,4-3rd,12-1st,14-3rd,15-3rd,16-3rd,17-1st,19-3rd,20-2nd
    Cup: Season 6-3rd,15-3rd,16-3rd

  9. #9
    Famous Qambu Yaasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,198
    I've lost 4 league titles against managers who on first impression do not attend matches but I am guessing they still login for the tokens and jst to do housekeep.

    As for your buddy's team
    1. His team started the season with good players. U say he didn't dump his first 11. That was the first 11 that won the double. He is most likely to continue his good form on the first season of abandonment.
    2. If he doesnt log in next season, his team will crumble definitely.

    Other than that, yes I agree that managers who attend matches should be given some sort of advantage. I also agree that having 5-6-7 star players doesn't guarantee you a title winning season, but it should guarantee a top 4 finish in the league.

    Sometimes a neglected 4-5 star players can do the job IF the active opponent screw up his team orders and formation, which is normally the case. Recently I destroyed a 5-6 star firstXI, 3-1 with my 4-5 star firstXI. I didn't attend the match, he did. He took the lead, I equalised then he made a substitution which opened the door for me to score 2 goals. I am guessing he panicked.
    Go Leo L24 Farmer ---

    Very Athletic L20 (Semi-Retired) --- Real Messy L16 (Retired) --- Athletic Kuching L17 --- Los Galaxy L14 28T

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by Qambu Yaasi View Post
    I've lost 4 league titles against managers who on first impression do not attend matches but I am guessing they still login for the tokens and jst to do housekeep.

    As for your buddy's team
    1. His team started the season with good players. U say he didn't dump his first 11. That was the first 11 that won the double. He is most likely to continue his good form on the first season of abandonment.
    2. If he doesnt log in next season, his team will crumble definitely.

    Other than that, yes I agree that managers who attend matches should be given some sort of advantage. I also agree that having 5-6-7 star players doesn't guarantee you a title winning season, but it should guarantee a top 4 finish in the league.

    Sometimes a neglected 4-5 star players can do the job IF the active opponent screw up his team orders and formation, which is normally the case. Recently I destroyed a 5-6 star firstXI, 3-1 with my 4-5 star firstXI. I didn't attend the match, he did. He took the lead, I equalised then he made a substitution which opened the door for me to score 2 goals. I am guessing he panicked.
    It doesn't matter if he logins in or doesn't. I think he does. I was answering to the statement that "the champs players are better cause he won the title". Hell no. My buddy's team trashed him face to face and has won all the possible titles. He won the Cup, he won the CL, he needed 2 more points in the last 2 games vs. a couple of weak teams to win the triple crown. He was testing formations on my team three times to beat that bottom feeder (and even though my team is one level lower, at the moment it was much stronger than his upcoming league opponent). He's beat me easily 3 times out of 3 tries, but could do nothing during that league game. The game engine just didn't let him score and allowed that abandoned team to score a game-winner from 30 meters. Two games in a row.

    Why would the Nordeus do that to active managers? I think cause a dedicated player might spend some money to win the titles, while someone who don't give a damn about watching his team games obviously won't. Give the title to someone who doesn't care and may be those who waste time watching, training and managing their teams might go further in their desire to win.

    As for my buddy's team
    1. Yes, and I've just tried answer to that ridiculous statement that the champs' players were better even though their rating was 1-2* lower.
    2. So what? Does it makes them bad players? His team currently proves that you don't have to manage your team to win in this game. Which is completely wrong. I'm loging in for him sometimes and just found out that his 13th level team outplayed a 14th level team with active manager in the Cup.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast