New Top Ratings qualifications

[khris]

In Port Vale acount 4 ST's and the GK of the team in 11th position, 61 goals recived ...LOL age 29, 3* GK of a team that is not managed, have SA individual defender or how is called lol... only another 29age player then all 12 retired...

So I understand that what fail are the wrong positions, and the rating as I've said have not lot of sense n this case,,, because too as I usually say, ratings are more about what can do a player in long term, not in a match. So the top rated players are sublime players that despite illegal formations, bad players near etc. will do a big contribution because are well proggrammed.
edited: thats the option 1, we haeve to prove this GK LOL

Option 2 is, this GK as my Djibril Cissé ST that had 8-8-8-7-8 and scored 3 goals in 26 matches show that ratings don't have sense and relation between how work the player/valoration.... ¿?

I want to belive that ratings talk us about long term usual contribution.