% of victory factors

[khris]

hey Gert, your image is great
Today played the 2nd leg and won 0-2 away (not so easily, the second goal was at last minutes, so if he scored, I would be out know).
But the reason I post this match isn't about to vent, why I have better team, sa, watching the game blah, blah, blah ..,
It's about if we 're overestimate the participation of formation in the results.
I would expect to win even if I had a same quality team (or a little lower), when I 'm watching and setting a counter formation but this thing doesn't work many times.

Khris is agree. LOL
I don't belive a lot in counter formations, thats why I do a mention of lots of things in this thread, everyone have a % of influence, and really the formations... I'm not sure about, but is just a little %, more important is to attend and obtain the +15% or have a key player.... I think that a good job searching for the correct players can aganst all the formations too, so...

I understand too that the game can not have 20 factors, everyone with 5% influence in the result and have realistic results... is not so simple, the game give a plus for who manages live and do a work of management of his team, searching for the best, and deciding basically, to try to explain. lol

[Gert Funck]

Khris is agree. LOL
I don't belive a lot in counter formations, thats why I do a mention of lots of things in this thread, everyone have a % of influence, and really the formations... I'm not sure about, but is just a little %, more important is to attend and obtain the +15% or have a key player.... I think that a good job searching for the correct players can aganst all the formations too, so...

I understand too that the game can not have 20 factors, everyone with 5% influence in the result and have realistic results... is not so simple, the game give a plus for who manages live and do a work of management of his team, searching for the best, and deciding basically, to try to explain. lol

I only use counter formation / tactics when the opponents formation is clearly faulty