Why are recommended players always Strikers -_-

[BeckStar]

One more time i get strikers.... dafck is going on haha..

[Ahlony Wong]

One more time i get strikers.... dafck is going on haha..

yours are not expensive...i just got mine in the last day of the season...very expensive-.-! quality 54, market volume 14.1M (the highest one, i am in LV6) need 79 token~~ yours market value 106M only 55 token ??

[Arion]

yours are not expensive...i just got mine in the last day of the season...very expensive-.-! quality 54, market volume 14.1M (the highest one, i am in LV6) need 79 token~~ yours market value 106M only 55 token ??

I guess all these recommendations are made by looking at your average team quality. For example, a 29Q Atlético Kolkata in Level 4 was recommended this:

[Ahlony Wong]

I guess all these recommendations are made by looking at your average team quality. For example, a 29Q Atlético Kolkata in Level 4 was recommended this:

but i am taking about the token...how come a market value 106M player is 55 token...and mine...14.1M need 79 token?? quality is different of course, i understand it (different LV)...but i think the price (token) should have a standard~

[talisman]

One more time i get strikers.... dafck is going on haha..

I guess all these recommendations are made by looking at your average team quality. For example, a 29Q Atlético Kolkata in Level 4 was recommended this:

Yet again Strikers with useless SAs - who wants a striker that takes FKs or Corners? You want them in the area on the other end of the kicks banging them in the net...

[Arion]

Yet again Strikers with useless SAs - who wants a striker that takes FKs or Corners? You want them in the area on the other end of the kicks banging them in the net...

Actually, st as setpiece taken perform better... I had a DC corner taker and have a ST corner taker... Latter has most assists in the team's history