I got 84.4M for my "top player" haha.. I could have sold the lowest, most useless player i have and I would have gotten more

In terms of trying to be a realistic game where is the logic in this? And why start with the best players and not the RES or subs when its obvious that this in my situation this would be more than enough?

A club lands in the red 1M, and to get on the green side again they sell they're best player, say worth 100M? Doesnt mather if he is then only GK or ST on the team. I now see I have overestimated how authentic this game really is, and if nothing is done with this I will not use a penny more on this game and Nordeus will loose a good customer. From a buisness point of wiev a stupid thing to do.

Is Nordeus perception "If you have been in the red for one week the best solution for every club is to sell they're best player/players" ? And this is because the game allows you to place bids way above youre finances. Where is the logic and realism in this? "Yes we allow you to place as many bids, nevermind the numbers and you might land 500M in the reds if you want. Then we warn you for one week that youre finances is ****ty, then we start selling all your best players" This is to me personally a strange feature, and I bet my left nut the people who say "you should have known this" probably found out about this the same way I did. If this fancy warning would say "Fix your finances! Remember the board will sell your best player if you have not taken care of this in a week" then the situation would probably be different, in 99% of these cases