Season 78 - Are you ready?

[talisman]

I'm surprised they could run more, as they were on hard attacking most of the second half...

One thing I've got to sort out is why the Terriers have started having problems with 3MC formations - all but one of the defeats this season have been that way, and have not had any issues previously...

[Tactician]

I'm surprised they could run more, as they were on hard attacking most of the second half...

One thing I've got to sort out is why the Terriers have started having problems with 3MC formations - all but one of the defeats this season have been that way, and have not had any issues previously...

What formation are you using, 4-5-1(V)?

[talisman]

What formation are you using, 4-5-1(V)?

Not that match I wasn't - 4-3N-2W(AM)-1. Normal/flanks/mixed passing. Changed to 4-2-2-2 Hexagon Hard attack/flanks/mixed (nothing to lose...) with the substitution and then started dominating.

Yeah, 2 vs 3 in midfield - but it seemed to work. Strange?

[Tactician]

Not that match I wasn't - 4-3N-2W(AM)-1. Normal/flanks/mixed passing. Changed to 4-2-2-2 Hexagon Hard attack/flanks/mixed (nothing to lose...) with the substitution and then started dominating.

Yeah, 2 vs 3 in midfield - but it seemed to work. Strange?

I have noticed that 4-2-2-2 (Hexagon) appeared to be overpowered lately. But, keep into consideration that this was only observed on the highlight parts, and hence on the scoreline, or based on the results of other team using this formation, but not necessarily in the match details (possession and so on). This formation used to be inferior, especially when faced with formations having 3 in the middle, but it seems as if something has changed. Recently, I got a draw against a lower quality team that used 4-2-2-2. This game behaves strangely at times.