Left-footed for left corners and Right-footed for right corners?

[Tactician]

can you share some about footedness and C-K ?

Some are in the comments. You already noticed one of them (this was for free-kicks). There are others too (for example, corners).
Some are visible in the 2-D highlights also. Observe and you will see.

I have said so many important things directly or indirectly, based on many observations, in several threads. This is called the scientific way of doing things; experiment, take observations and make deductions. Yet, some users, including some so called 'experienced users' fail to see some things.

[Ibrahim Bavari]

I agree with those who say right footed or left doesn't mean much in this game ,, you just need to choose the player with high crossing skills and then wish good luck

[nikolgiorgos]

can you share some about footedness and C-K ?

Some are in the comments. You already noticed one of them (this was for free-kicks). There are others too (for example, corners).

There aren't comments about feet and corners.
About F-K yes but probably random
Check this,
http://forum.topeleven.com/top-eleve...ured-side.html

[Tactician]

There aren't comments about feet and corners.
About F-K yes but probably random
Check this,
http://forum.topeleven.com/top-eleve...ured-side.html

There are, though they are not very evident. Observe, and you will find out about those that you did not notice. Why will I lie to you? Like I said above you helped me recently, and also you helped me in 2015 too when I started using your preferred formation - 4-5-1(V).

[Tactician]

Someone from Nordeus said that it is up to the user to find out such things. They won't confirm things or give significant clues about those. The same applies for things like arrows and so on. Remember when you told me that putting an 2 arrows in one formation make this be the same as another formation, and what I told you? Yet, I'm sure you still don't see it this way. Don't you think that if it was only a matter of arrows, then why do other formations exist? There is a difference between a red-arrowed MR and a neutral AMR. The same applies for the other positions. If you still can't see why, look more. If you still don't see, it is ok. Not all people are on the same level. You helped me, and I returned you the favour by telling you something that you did not know. Do you think that I would tell you such a thing if I was not sure about it? If ever I say something that I am not sure about, I will use words like probably, maybe and so on. So, if a user don't know when such words are used and why, that is his problem, or maybe should I start doing some English classes here as well? Do you think that I want to mislead you or other users? I will never mislead someone though I might stay quiet on some things because not all things can be revealed to anyone. I made many conclusions about this game after a lot of observations; I shared many of them. I do not post the data part, but this does not mean that I don't have enough proof of some things or things like that. Users are free to believe in what they want, but if ever they are penalised for believing in something that is wrong or is bad, then they are responsible to some extent. One main problem in this world is that people tend to believe more in lies rather than in truth.

By the way, even people from Nordeus tell lies to users. I won't say who and who, and on what. But, I have noticed some things. So, do not always trust what comes out from them. Always take everything with a grain of salt.

[nikolgiorgos]

Someone from Nordeus said that it is up to the user to find out such things.

yes and I found out that footedness is random for F-K.
But don't change subject or speak general.
This thread is about footedness and corners and I 'm still waiting some indicator for this.

[Tactician]

yes and I found out that footedness is random for F-K.
But don't change subject or speak general.
This thread is about footedness and corners and I 'm still waiting some indicator for this.

I have brought something else into here because it is related and also there is something in there that I want you to see. But, it seems that you still don't see it.

You can either wait or you can try to observe and see.

I have already told you there are for corners too. Don't wait for me to tell you what exactly it is. If I do things like that, then this game will become too easy, especially for some that already have other significant advantages compared to others.

About the randomness as such in this game, from my observations I can say that it does exist, but not to the extent what you think it is. Experiments can be done to eliminate the doubt of something occurring due to randomness or due to randomness mainly, be it in real life situations or in this game. So, you can start doing things the scientific way too (if you want).

[nikolgiorgos]

ok, if someone else understand, please explain to me too.

[Abhinavsharma]

ok, if someone else understand, please explain to me too.

It is tough then Thermodynamics sorry I also not understand.

[Tactician]

It is tough then Thermodynamics sorry I also not understand.

Hahahaha.

You don't like Physical Sciences?

For sure, it is relatively tough, especially for those that don't have the proper way of thinking or don't have enough logic; even some experience is needed. I have done Sciences at college level and I'm now doing Chemistry at university level. Thermodynamics is in this course too; it is in the Physical Chemistry modules mainly. If someone takes his time to read and understand the concepts and so on, it is less tough. The problem these days is that everything is being rushed, including education, most probably due to the business side of it. I think that some BSc degrees should be at least 4-5 years instead of 3 years. As it is now, many students have to rush through things. This is not an appropriate way for learning new things, especially things that are relatively tough or are classified among the higher levels.

In my opinion, Chemistry is one of the toughest subjects.