Printable View
Today, I saw something, that makes me crazy... :p
Attachment 66895
Is there any meaning on the orders of the positions?
First, I thought, it's only which position they currently play, but it isn't.
I also thought, it's only the order, who they learned it - but it isn't it. I looked at this guy and he could play ST/AMR, I learned him AMC...
Attachment 66894
Maybe it's their favorite position?
Are their experience?
It is random.
Because we can't write 3 position in one position lol
But it is possible for player using both foot.We say it either foot rather than left foot,right foot.
Can you predict fav foot from either foot lol
I have noticed the order of the positions changing, especially after doing training or after playing a match. For instance, DMC/DC to DC/DMC and vice versa. I suspect that the order may be related to the attributes of the player, but for some players it does not make sense. For example, a DR/DC is expected to have better crossing and speed relative to the other attributes related to the DC position, but I had a player that was relative poor in those two attributes and yet the order remained the same in almost 2 seasons despite training him mainly for attributes related to DC position. Maybe there is a flaw in the system that determines the order of the positions, that is it does not always consider the right attributes.
Who gives a damn if they perform good :rolleyes:
Do you think so muccch?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tactician
I had a Defender who could play DL and DC - in the order DL/DC. I always set him left DC. Two weeks he performed around 5-6. My regular DL was blocked for one game. I only had another "single" DC, so I set the first one DL. I missed this and the following match, checked ratings and the DL/DC got 8 and 9. From that moment, he only plays DL. His best performance is at the cupgames, 9-10 - maybe, because there are equal and better teams. His % increases up to 10% per match. But he is the only player, I've noticed this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arion
I was just wondering, because in the Old Version, it's alway DL-DC-DR.
Its just probably the order they were added to the player (learnt) ive never noticed ones order changing.
Nash123, post the attributes profile of the that DL/DC. Also post the part where it shows the preferred foot.
By the way, how are those DL/DC/DR players performing at each of those positions? I have a DC/DR that I intend to train to DL, but it would better to have some feedback on how such players are doing.
Attachment 66972Quote:
Originally Posted by Tactician
Left guy is the DL/DC (first DC, now only DL), right guy is the old DL, now he plays mostly DC. His performance on DL, DC and DR is nearly the same. His rating is around 7-9, depents on opponent (if I play against teams on the bottom of the League, there is nothing to do... :p )
Left guy I bought at age 18, right guy at 19.
It's how I often say - I like my team, my players, so I wanna stay with them. :)
How much skill points where those players gaining per training session for the new position? I have started training my DR/DC for DL, but he did not make any gains in his first training, and only gained 1 skill point after the first match, which is strange because he is a fast trainer. Someone also reported on this forum here about the training not progressing new position addition.
I remember reading somewhere that the first position is the stronger one and the 2nd and 3rd positions get a positional penalty of sorts.
That is why you see DML/DR and DR/DML.
This is how it is expected to be, but I think there might be a flaw in this game concerning this. Like I have said previously, I had a DR/DC that had better attributes for the DC position than the DR position, that is he was relatively poor in crossing and speed. He performed decently at DC and, in fact, performed better than other DCs in the team at that time. He was also trained mainly for DC and DMC skills rather than specific DR skills during the period he was with the team. Yet, the positions displayed remained always as DR/DC rather than changing to DC/DR. It may be due to the hidden effects also, that is despite having better DC skills, a player could be better at DR.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sully
I have two players in my team whose positions orders keep changing after training or after having played a match. One is a DC/DMC and the other is DMC/DC. The position orders keep changing from DC/DMC to DMC/DC and vice versa.
Now, I have a DR/DC which I want to train to play at DL also. Based on the displayed attributes for him, he has better qualities to play at DL first, DR second and DC last, but they are all very close to each other which means that he could become a very good utility defender. The problem is that the progress for the new position seems slow as compared to the progress of the different individual skills when using the new training system.
My regular DL has DC/DL thoQuote:
Originally Posted by nash123
I guess if you have 2 players for example one who is DC and other is DC/DL then choosing who plays in DC wont only depend on where he performs best but also on your opponent attckers/wingers or whatever
if the opponent uses a strong ST then I need a more defensive player with a defensive attributes then I will select the one who does this for me
it depends on every match and what qualityyour opponent or what you want from the match
I try to sign DCs with either DMC or DL/DR not just for the position option but they also train more skills; speed and crossing, notably. I dont like slow DCs that can't kick long balls.
