What kind of ridiculous opponents we face in Associations?

[Cloverfield]

Decrease the ticket prize till the stadium gets full.

And of course keep upgrading all your facilities.

[woopypooky]

Hello Top Eleven managers, can someone plz tell me what to do about my low stadium turnout despite having a decent stadium capacity of 43k I have never had 20k fans on a match day my fans are always below 20k which is worrisome to me and I have car parking lot of about 2k. Please what can I do to bring more fans to my stadium.

lower your ticket price until u reach like 95% capacity full, in order to also get 5% possesion. Keep upgrading carpark.
Also one thing I figured is the higher your visiting team, the more fans want to watch

[woopypooky]

With associations, you'll face associations with roughly the same quality as yours regardless of your association level.

What will happen if you have a tanking member is, the average quality of your opponents will be higher than the average quality during the previous season. That said, if its your strongest member that is tanking, it shouldn't hurt you, because that player will be able to offset his quality boost with loans. If it's one of your 3 or 4 weakest teams that is tanking, there is no advantage to tanking, and actually it will hurt your association, since the higher an associations's average quality, the higher the odds of playing against an association with 6 actives.

does that also mean when recruiting new members, the best is the new members quality is close to the existing members, there no point if the new member is 120% if old members are 80% quality?

[pcmacdaniel]

does that also mean when recruiting new members, the best is the new members quality is close to the existing members, there no point if the new member is 120% if old members are 80% quality?

Not necessarily, it depends largely upon whether or not the overpowering team (relative to the others) is loaning out players. What's more important than quality of the teams is that their managers are skilled and active.

Managers that are active are a dime a dozen; but ones that are skilled and active can be hard to find.

[USARABAT]

they don't buy 2000 tokens for each player but they do the tanking strategy which is remaining 4 season in a raw at the same level and with heavy training they reach 160%

[Bunzo]

they don't buy 2000 tokens for each player but they do the tanking strategy which is remaining 4 season in a raw at the same level and with heavy training they reach 160%

They were not up to that trick a year ago.... then the loan exploitation trick was in full swing
And as for the Far East teams VPN was very popular

[USARABAT]

I heard also that the manager of such a legendary team created so many other accounts and used their rests to train his main players by using the loan .
but what makes you sure that they didn't apply the tank strategy in the same time ?

[Bunzo]

That Tanking was not in fashion then not to the extent of todays Tankers
They also seemed to be treble hunters as well

[Tyltyl]

I have a team like this in my league, CL and cup, the same one. It started great and got full in a matter of days.
Yesterday I was almost able to get a draw against him, but still it's kind of BS. It's ok and legit to spend, but IMHO the gap between the min and max quality should be shorter. Having 9 stars is stupid and illogical too (why 9 and not even 10?).
Make it 5* maximum for legend players and 4 for scouts, while at the same time taking it longer to level up. If you get 5* team you are equivalent to Barca, while if you have 4*,4 1/2* you are equivalent to Chelsea or PSG.
If the difference is like what we have now, it's like Skenderbeu 6* and Barcellona 9* playing in the same CL group or League
WTF?

[Tyltyl]

Oh and by the way Nordeus, 100% is an implicit maximum, why go over? Make the actual maximum level quality 100% and not 200%, because **** logic.
That way it would be more logical to have percentage as a quality standard.