Results 1 to 10 of 12
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Why am I losing to a team that is 20 percent quality below me?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Spanish Forum Moderator khris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    16,360
    20% is just +1 star, never enough if we think tha the game will choose some playrs to be protagonists during the match and that some of these players that have -1* can have a good ratio of scoring.

    Sometimes a simulation can reate a situation in what key players do not appear and others fail continously meanwhile the team that have a slightly less quality see how are choosen by their side players that can have 5 chances and score 4.

    So in resume, all is more extense than say simply that one had +1 star, because the margin of surprise is bigger really, let's say till +3* so +60% AvQ. differance depending of the players internal programming, scenario of the match and maybe how one assign the skill points, for example training the speed till 9-10* Ive beaten many times teams of 9*, having 6* as Average Quality.

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Tomasdfgh View Post
    Why am I losing to a team that is 20 percent quality below me?-img_2183.jpgWhy am I losing to a team that is 20 percent quality below me?-img_2184.jpgWhy am I losing to a team that is 20 percent quality below me?-img_2185.jpgWhy am I losing to a team that is 20 percent quality below me?-img_2186.jpg
    Notice how the star of and morale of my players are a lot better than my opponent?
    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Brinkhuijsen View Post
    Always these complaints. Never somebody who is saying "I won from a team that was 20% better as me.
    I do it all the time.
    I guess he has a perfect played plan against you and he beat your butt. Happens all the time
    Quote Originally Posted by khris View Post
    20% is just +1 star, never enough if we think tha the game will choose some playrs to be protagonists during the match and that some of these players that have -1* can have a good ratio of scoring.

    Sometimes a simulation can reate a situation in what key players do not appear and others fail continously meanwhile the team that have a slightly less quality see how are choosen by their side players that can have 5 chances and score 4.

    So in resume, all is more extense than say simply that one had +1 star, because the margin of surprise is bigger really, let's say till +3* so +60% AvQ. differance depending of the players internal programming, scenario of the match and maybe how one assign the skill points, for example training the speed till 9-10* Ive beaten many times teams of 9*, having 6* as Average Quality.
    Oh, ok I understand now, but I still bitter that I got beaten from a team that seems to have quit the game, and also scored 2 consecutive goals in 2 minutes.