Results 1 to 10 of 27
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Why always 4-4-2 classic???

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Palma, Mallorca
    Posts
    2,363
    Quote Originally Posted by singaboy View Post
    This morning I just play CL against classic 4-4-2. This guy is also in my League, right behind me. He always play 4-4-2, he is token buyer and never present at the game.

    I play counter formation 4-5-1V home game I won 1-0. Yesterday, away I play 3-2-2-2-1 butterfly also counter 4-4-2 and I lost 1-0 even though my team is much stronger and I present at the game at 4:33am (damn it). Luckily the penalty shoot out I won by marginal 5-4 if not I would be very piss off.

    Thus 4-4-2 is still a damn strong formation and even counter formation cannot always win. I think that counter formation is not working any more or at least not as much as it used to be. So be yourself !
    Maybe you should have tried the best counter for 4-4-2: 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond. You probably would have kicked @ss in both games with this formation.

  2. #2
    Dreamer gkassimis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    433
    Quote Originally Posted by cracicot View Post
    Maybe you should have tried the best counter for 4-4-2: 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond. You probably would have kicked @ss in both games with this formation.
    don't bet your money on it. what if he has quality wingers motivated and he focus passing down the flanks? it's 50-50
    Kyparissia FC
    Level 35
    28 Champions, 15 Champions League, 15 Cups, 2 Super Cup

  3. #3
    Rookie singaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Manchester United
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by gkassimis View Post
    don't bet your money on it. what if he has quality wingers motivated and he focus passing down the flanks? it's 50-50
    You are so right about my team. I have very good wingers and focus passing down the flanks especially on the right where the opponent's defender is only 3 stars while my AMR is 5 stars. I also motivated red arrow on my AMR, he was very active during the match however so many miss chances therefore I lost 1-0.

    Are you sure 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond is much better against 4-4-2 classic compare to 4-5-1V and 3-2-2-2-1 Butterfly?

  4. #4
    Dreamer gkassimis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    433
    Quote Originally Posted by singaboy View Post
    You are so right about my team. I have very good wingers and focus passing down the flanks especially on the right where the opponent's defender is only 3 stars while my AMR is 5 stars. I also motivated red arrow on my AMR, he was very active during the match however so many miss chances therefore I lost 1-0.

    Are you sure 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond is much better against 4-4-2 classic compare to 4-5-1V and 3-2-2-2-1 Butterfly?
    i never play narrow diamond. never. it's too risky and i don't take risks. both 4-5-1 v and butterfly are good against classic 4-4-2 but i believe that 4-3w-1-2 with motivated wingers and the amc is superior.
    Kyparissia FC
    Level 35
    28 Champions, 15 Champions League, 15 Cups, 2 Super Cup