Why always 4-4-2 classic???

[hell_storm2004]

I never played 1 up front. I stick with 4-1-2-1-2. DMC, MR, ML, AMC and two forwards. I have had good luck with it so far!

[gkassimis]

You are so right about my team. I have very good wingers and focus passing down the flanks especially on the right where the opponent's defender is only 3 stars while my AMR is 5 stars. I also motivated red arrow on my AMR, he was very active during the match however so many miss chances therefore I lost 1-0.

Are you sure 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond is much better against 4-4-2 classic compare to 4-5-1V and 3-2-2-2-1 Butterfly?

i never play narrow diamond. never. it's too risky and i don't take risks. both 4-5-1 v and butterfly are good against classic 4-4-2 but i believe that 4-3w-1-2 with motivated wingers and the amc is superior.

[hell_storm2004]

3 at the back. Not for me! Only Napoli can do it!

[Crocket]

4-1-2-1-2 para mi es la mejor . estoy primero en liga y el año pasado quede primero en liga y en liga de campeones , y lo de jugar contra amigos es divertido nosotros desde la primera liga e mos subido 6 juntos y esta de los 8 primeros somos todo el grupo y nos apoyamos para que ganen a los contrarios para seguir juntos.

[ice87s]

i am happy to face opponents with classic 4-4-2, as i'm always win them.

However, there is a modified 4-4-2 which is
----ST--ST
ML-MC-MC-AMR
DL-DC-DC-DR

I always lose to this kind of formation with 2-3 goals where i am 10 qualities higher than opponent dont know why......

[dv8r]

i am happy to face opponents with classic 4-4-2, as i'm always win them.

However, there is a modified 4-4-2 which is
-------ST
ML-MC-MC-AMR
DL-DC-DC-DR

I always lose to this kind of formation, dont know why......

They have 10 players?

[ice87s]

They have 10 players?

sry, 2ST