Why always 4-4-2 classic???

[singaboy]

don't bet your money on it. what if he has quality wingers motivated and he focus passing down the flanks? it's 50-50

You are so right about my team. I have very good wingers and focus passing down the flanks especially on the right where the opponent's defender is only 3 stars while my AMR is 5 stars. I also motivated red arrow on my AMR, he was very active during the match however so many miss chances therefore I lost 1-0.

Are you sure 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond is much better against 4-4-2 classic compare to 4-5-1V and 3-2-2-2-1 Butterfly?

[gkassimis]

You are so right about my team. I have very good wingers and focus passing down the flanks especially on the right where the opponent's defender is only 3 stars while my AMR is 5 stars. I also motivated red arrow on my AMR, he was very active during the match however so many miss chances therefore I lost 1-0.

Are you sure 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond is much better against 4-4-2 classic compare to 4-5-1V and 3-2-2-2-1 Butterfly?

i never play narrow diamond. never. it's too risky and i don't take risks. both 4-5-1 v and butterfly are good against classic 4-4-2 but i believe that 4-3w-1-2 with motivated wingers and the amc is superior.