Strange draw or cheating in FA matches???

[a.gavrilin]

Truly remarkable.
So was that just the luck of the draw?
Paolo Hernrick or whatever your name is, how many teams you got?
What a waste of time associations is.

Actually these are the 2 reasons I made this thread. Simply I want to find out and pay the Nordeus attention to the below facts:

1. Is it possible to influence the draw of the FA tourney? The game between these 2 Brazilian teams don't look like coincidence, so if anyone have ever played with any of these teams, or have similar strange results in their tourneys - please, let us know.

2. Why the system makes possible such draws - 6 stars FA against 8 stars. Our top 3 teams are 114, 113 and 112,5. They top 3 were 187, 176 and 168. Our lowest team 68% and their 112 if I remember it correctly. And only 2 teams had the difference of 10% in their favour (some 110 to 120 +/- 2%). This is a huge difference. Or maybe there is again any way to influence the draw?

If case it is possible - this bug/cheat must be corrected. Even if the FA games have a lot of strange or render results and the engine looks different from the main game - we still enjoy playing it with my friends. So it must be improved to work perfectly

[Ποσιδονας]

Actually these are the 2 reasons I made this thread. Simply I want to find out and pay the Nordeus attention to the below facts:

1. Is it possible to influence the draw of the FA tourney? The game between these 2 Brazilian teams don't look like coincidence, so if anyone have ever played with any of these teams, or have similar strange results in their tourneys - please, let us know.

2. Why the system makes possible such draws - 6 stars FA against 8 stars. Our top 3 teams are 114, 113 and 112,5. They top 3 were 187, 176 and 168. Our lowest team 68% and their 112 if I remember it correctly. And only 2 teams had the difference of 10% in their favour (some 110 to 120 +/- 2%). This is a huge difference. Or maybe there is again any way to influence the draw?

The draw with those "friendly" asso groups must be coincidence.
You can't affect the draw. I mean like two friends who can play in the same league.

About pair of quality, as I can see from your pic, the three teams are fake new google accounts which started with 3* players.
So they dropped the avg of their group.
Right after the draw, they bought some players, maybe from the started token a couple of scouts, they also got 3 loans from the others, used all their greens and made 6* teams.
Next weekend they put 3 other teams instead of those.

That's a classic trick.

[a.gavrilin]

The draw with those "friendly" asso groups must be coincidence.
You can't affect the draw. I mean like two friends who can play in the same league.

About pair of quality, as I can see from your pic, the three teams are fake new google accounts which started with 3* players.
So they dropped the avg of their group.
Right after the draw, they bought some players, maybe from the started token a couple of scouts, they also got 3 loans from the others, used all their greens and made 6* teams.
Next weekend they put 3 other teams instead of those.

That's a classic trick.

You are absolutely right and I know this trick quite well and a lot of FAs that are using it (which in my point of view must be also fixed). But the strange thing is that this time the strength of the team was like this exactly from the first second of the tourney. I usually check the draws in the first 5 minutes once they appear and this time they were 8 stars just from the start.

Now I have another idea - maybe the pools of the teams for all 4 tourneys (I means for the whole playing season) are also made the first day of the season together with cup, ch.league and league? In this case it can explain the situation - the 1st day they had 3 strong teams and 3 rubbish teams making their total strength close to 6 stars. And then during the season the draws are made from this pool of let's say 20 teams