[Official] News Surrounding Upcoming Changes - 14th of November

[Jeeves]

Well after the first few days post launch, the bugs were being discovered and reported. I even recall how frantically the support team rushed to document everything and assess what is even going on with what system and where or at which points in time. People who've contacted support during the days past launch would have noticed that even the questions agents asked them might/would have changed by the hour. As more info was available the clearer the picture regarding any bug became.

During and after those moments, the data was streaming toward the dev and other operational departments over here. With each issue being clearly specified and concrete data becoming available, the process of investigating what parts of the code were breaking or making the particular function act up or what have you, began. Issue after issue everything was documented. Took time though, and naturally so.

And now we're at the point where one after another the issues are being worked on while further improvements and/or changes based on the feedback we gathered in the past week were being devised (Sausy's post is the fruit of that feedback analysis). Some fixes will require something more than a server reset to be executed. I believe that a number of fixes will be applied come update 6.1.

[rogerniceguy]

Well after the first few days post launch, the bugs were being discovered and reported. I even recall how frantically the support team rushed to document everything and assess what is even going on with what system and where or at which points in time. People who've contacted support during the days past launch would have noticed that even the questions agents asked them might/would have changed by the hour. As more info was available the clearer the picture regarding any bug became.

During and after those moments, the data was streaming toward the dev and other operational departments over here. With each issue being clearly specified and concrete data becoming available, the process of investigating what parts of the code were breaking or making the particular function act up or what have you, began. Issue after issue everything was documented. Took time though, and naturally so.

And now we're at the point where one after another the issues are being worked on while further improvements and/or changes based on the feedback we gathered in the past week were being devised (Sausy's post is the fruit of that feedback analysis). Some fixes will require something more than a server reset to be executed. I believe that a number of fixes will be applied come update 6.1.

Any timescale for 6.1 Jeeves? Also I feel there should be a communication sent out within the game so all users (not just forum users) are aware of what's going on. Dare I suggest a goodwill compensation as well.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[Jeeves]

Oh and about the DMC role being added (And all other scenarios that stem from it - Check Sausy's OP again).

The decision wasn't arbitrary. We sat down and had a decently long talk about it. We decided on this to be our action due to what the whole matter encompassed - Changes with 6.0 were related to the defence element of the squad; What are the technical abilities; What are the technical limitations;
So the DMC role was decided upon with the intent of giving something useful to people while keeping to the boundaries of the nature of the change. And at the same time not to affect game balance.
To quote Sausy: "With this in mind, we’re looking at ways to address the frustrations of players who lost a role in a way that doesn’t affect game balance."

I was personally all for the DMC idea. To me it was the fairest solution. I know that not everyone would agree and that there are those who would agree. I do hope we will understand each other in all of this. (I need more forum emoji's to express myself properly...)