Results 1 to 10 of 20
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Can a 3-defender-formation be successful when op AML/AMR players exist?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Famous Der_Ryan_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,652
    Quote Originally Posted by SHNM View Post
    I think after all the experiments you will return to V style again. In the scheme of three defenders, DL-DC-DR-DMC-2MC-ML-MR-2ST shows itself very well. One change of DMC to AMC, if necessary, change the style of your team. and vice versa.
    Now that this thread is up again, I'm back to 4-5-1 V. Its just the best, there is nothing you can say against it. I played with a 3-2-3-1-1 for about 2 seasons and I did decent, than I also tried a 4-1-3-1-1, but with V style my wingers are scoring left and right and I win far more games than with the other formations.

  2. #2
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Der_Ryan_M View Post
    Now that this thread is up again, I'm back to 4-5-1 V. Its just the best, there is nothing you can say against it. I played with a 3-2-3-1-1 for about 2 seasons and I did decent, than I also tried a 4-1-3-1-1, but with V style my wingers are scoring left and right and I win far more games than with the other formations.
    I almost always beat 4-5-1 V
    hard attacking , short passes on the wings,pressing low using 3DC-2MC-ML-MR-AMC-2ST

    my ML and MR usually just on the line to AMR AML or just simply AML AMR
    still wins

    I guess thats its achilles heel
    pcmacdaniel likes this.