Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By adifairus

Thread: Player stat impact (which one is "better")

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    16

    Player stat impact (which one is "better")

    Player stat impact (which one is "better")-screenshot_1.jpg

    One has better overall stats, full star higher than the other. Other one is much better in defense but completely lacks attack and p&m.
    I realize certain stats are supposed to have more impact but at what magnitude is beyond me.
    So the question is, which one will perform better at DL or DC position. Also, does order of positions impact player's performance in any way? Will DL/DC on DL position perform better than DC/DL
    Any useful insight is welcome.
    Last edited by AlenOpasnost; 04-18-2018 at 03:06 AM.

  2. #2
    Addicted adifairus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    502
    Quote Originally Posted by AlenOpasnost View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_1.jpg 
Views:	65 
Size:	87.2 KB 
ID:	98684

    One has better overall stats, full star higher than the other. Other one is much better in defense but completely lacks attack and p&m.
    I realize certain stats are supposed to have more impact but at what magnitude is beyond me.
    So the question is, which one will perform better at DL or DC position. Also, does order of positions impact player's performance in any way? Will DL/DC on DL position perform better than DC/DL
    Any useful insight is welcome.
    my method of choosing player for specific position is as below. just calculate the white skill for specific position only,

    but this is just by numerical comparison, still need to be test in actual and compare his in match rating also and then make your conclusion

    Danny Lawton
    - DC skill avg : (151+111+154+165+128+34+11+68)/8 = 102.75%
    - DL skill avg : (151+111+154+128+122+34+68+75)/8 = 105.375%

    Ruben Pinocchio
    - DC skill avg : (115+147+112+123+118+104+89+101)/8 = 113.625%
    - DL skill avg : (115+147+112+118+112+104+101+102)/8 = 113.875%
    Toxcatl and AlenOpasnost like this.
    I never lose, it's either i win or i learned

  3. #3
    Apprentice Rizla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    288
    Sure thing is that attributes plays bigger role than overall quality.
    That means Lewton with some training in P&M skills will perform better than Pacheco
    but his overall quality will be lower.

  4. #4
    Famous Toxcatl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Rizla View Post
    Sure thing is that attributes plays bigger role than overall quality.
    "Sure thing", really? Do you have any proof?

    Oh, and btw even if they do, adifairus made calculations that tell Pacheco is better.
    Last edited by Toxcatl; 04-18-2018 at 04:35 PM.
    It wasn't our day.

  5. #5
    Apprentice Rizla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    288
    Allready explain why in the example above Pacheco is better.
    Proof is that team with "well trained" highlighted attributes has no problem with teams
    which are better ιn quality but not "well trained"...
    Last edited by Rizla; 04-19-2018 at 11:11 AM.