Player Position Contributes Effect to Formation ( Theory )

[mahisaagni]

I'm curious with each player position and its effect to the formation


if you look at match preview scene, there will be comparison of % quality between 2 teams

Defend, Midfield, Attack

Defend Role consist of GK DC DR DL DMC

Midfield Role consist of DMC MC MR ML AMC AML AMR

Attack Role consist of AMC AML AMR ST

Yes, DMC AMR AMC AML contributes to 2 MAIN ROLE , DMC contributes to Defend & Midfield while AMR AMC AML contributes to Attack & Midfield ( You can try change your five or six star AMC AMR AML, and look at match preview scene, the % of change will be on Midfield & Attack, so do the DMC )

So, there are 4 MAIN ROLE = Goalkeeper, Defender, Midfielder, Attacker

And then, every main role has its own SPESIFIC ROLE =

GK --- DR DL DC --- DMC MC ML MR AMC --- AML AMR ST

the contribution of the MAIN ROLE to the formation different with SPESIFIC ROLE


_THE MAIN ROLE_

Goalkeeper = 100% to defend
Defender = 100% to defend
Midfielder = 50% to attack , 50% to defend
Attacker = 100% attack

Simple as that
And then, there are THE SPESIFIC ROLE which come with more details in attack & defence contribution


_THE SPESIFIC ROLE_


We know that there are 3 kind of skill =

Defence , Attack, Physical
Every skill has 5 categories
Defence with tackling, marking,etc
Attack with dribbling, passing,etc
Physical with fitness, speed,etc
( GK the only exception )


And we know that each position has its main attributes, once again GK is the only exception and i think GK stand outside from formation because when you look at match statistic, in some occasion GK has it unique way



position >>> main attributes


DC >>> 5/5 defence skill as main attributes, 0/5 attack skill as main attributes

DR DL >>> 4/5 defence skill, 1/5 attack skill

DMC >>> 4/5 defence skill, 1/5 attack skill

MC >>> 4/5 defence skill, 3/5 attack skill

ML MR >>> 1/5 defence skill, 3/5 attack skill

AMC >>> 1/5 defence skill, 4/5 attack skill

AML AMR >>> 0/5 defence, 5/5 attack skill

ST >>> 2/5 defence, 4/5 attack skill


The question is, Does the highlighted main attributes of Attack & Defence represent the player contribution to formation / match ??

DC >>> 5/5 Def & 0/5 Att >>> 100% Contribution when defending & 0% Contribution when attacking

DR DL >>> 4/5 Def, 1/5 Att >>> 80% defending contribution & 20 % attacking contribution

DMC >>> 4/5 def, 1/5 att >>> 80% defending contribution & 20% attacking contribution

MC >>> 4/5 def, 3/5 att >>>
80% defending contribution & 60 % attacking contribution

ML MR >>> 1/5 def, 3/5 att >>> 20% defending contribution & 60 % attacking contribution

AMC >>> 1/5 def, 4/5 att >>> 20% defending contribution & 80 % attacking contribution

AML AMR >>> 0/5 def, 5/5 att >>> 0% defending contribution & 100 % attacking contribution

ST >>> 2/5 def, 4/5 att >>> 40% defending contribution & 80 % attacking contribution,
if this is true then it answer why AMR AML scores more goals than ST



I still don't know the contribution of Physical skill into the formation / match

By the way, this is just a theory
Feel free to give your opinions

[adifairus]

straight answering to your question, specific player skill does give effect at specific zone, mutant team already prove it

[mahisaagni]

straight answering to your question, specific player skill does give effect at specific zone, mutant team already prove it

Really ? Fortunately i never have that mutant & never played against them 🤔

thanks mate

[nikolgiorgos]

straight answering to your question, specific player skill does give effect at specific zone, mutant team already prove it

mutants is bug, a glitch that outsmarts the game mechanics.
Remember the first mutants with 1500% fitness and Strength ?
About the same way it works the 340%-1%.

@mahisaagni
attackers too contributes to defense but in a small role.
I guess something like 75%-20%-5 % (A-M-D)

[khris]

After years trying to know how the internal programming works, nope... IMO the game don't work like this... and to start the analysis from some point we should know about what's hidden in every player... there are for example MCs that are more defenders than MCs or attackers...DL-R that are more AML-R... STs that are more MCs.... inclusive defending... and the external skills do not affect the "internal behavior base" .

You don't see 2 equal players if you train their shooting to 340%... as is a matter of internal calibration + internal limits maybe the max o shooting is 1/10 shoots and you can train all what you want. But if one thing has been proved here is that you can not select 2 players, and with the training convert them in 2 exact players...


The visual side of the players is just cosmetic, effects in the scenario selection and % of chances of winning in the 1vs1 comparison, taking into account the % diff' with the rival team and then "some individualities chosen for the match to be used to create this scenario".

That's why if you add 1* players in the team and these are ignored the team can perfectly work... with 1, 2,3... same with mutants... only 1 don't unbalance the ratio of winning chances for this random selection.... but some of these players yes, then break the simulation, despite that a mutant with 340%'s in the animation can not have the behavior as a "player with 340's"... is like when you have 5 players with FK specialist SA... all of them can fail the FKs....

So, this is not so easy xD

[SamAS200]

Anybody know 4-2mc-3-1 tactics...? Is this formation is defensive or attacking.,.?

[SamAS200]

Anybody know 4-2mc-3-1 tactics...? Is this formation is defensive or attacking.,.?

anybody knows...?

[khris]

anybody knows...?

I used it until I changed for a 4-3-3 few days ago...

It is defensive or attacking depending of the orders and players... think that a 5-3-2 can perfectly attack the whole match...

I would start with passing focussed to the flanks and during the match switch to right or left, one day works one way, one day another, inclusive a try for the middle depending of the rival.
I was playing defensive, with long passing.. On offside and ON counters -as always by my side- and more or less that's how I used it.

[SamAS200]

I used it until I changed for a 4-3-3 few days ago...

It is defensive or attacking depending of the orders and players... think that a 5-3-2 can perfectly attack the whole match...

I would start with passing focussed to the flanks and during the match switch to right or left, one day works one way, one day another, inclusive a try for the middle depending of the rival.
I was playing defensive, with long passing.. On offside and ON counters -as always by my side- and more or less that's how I used it.

thanks and one more issue today i saw in league match my attendance was full according to my level 6 but i get only 2% possession not 5% why...? Is it bug..?

[SamAS200]

thanks and one more issue today i saw in league match my attendance was full according to my level 6 but i get only 2% possession not 5% why...? Is it bug..?

have you face this bug...? #khris