Bad striker

[pcmacdaniel]

Hi managers. I have one question
My forward in TOP11 are not at all key players.
they usually have a rating in match of 6-7
Last season my attacker1 had 9 goals in 60 match and attacker2 had 15 goals in 55 match. most of the goal
they give players on positions AML and AMR.
AML - 46 Match 53 Goals and 19 assist (buy at scout)
AMR - similar above average statistics
is the error in formation?

Are attackers with supernormal attributes better?
for example shoot 240% and speed 38%? I bought such a player but it did not help.

My formarion:
DR-DC-DL
MC-MC
AML-AMC-AMR
ST-ST

AML and AMR are a lot in the front

The problem isn't your formation. There has been a problem with good striker play in top eleven for 2-3 years now (relative to AML and AMR).

That said, I have a good one.



The tricky thing with Strikers, is that height and weight are important (They need to be to physically overpower defenders to best take advance of good service from the flanks). With AML and AMR, those two attributes don't matter nearly as much, if they do at all, so it's much more rare to find a bad AML or AMR.

Whenever I've had undersized strikers, they've sucked; 10 goals in 3 seasons kind of sucked. But the strikers with a larger frame have been terrific.



Skills are important too, and mine are abit excessive. That said, just make sure to get a big one, then train him up.