I CAN post screenshots from last week, from a game I watched.




Again, this is a situation I have personally seen dozens of times, and others brpoght up in the illegal formation thread - an otherwise legal formation, with 80/20 possession. Invariably there's a non-GK playing keeper. Does that matter to you? No. Because after all, I'm just "making things up", right?
If a non-GK at keeper is not the reason for the possession penalty in the above case, and the dozens of others like it, then either a) there's some other explanation and the fact that
every time it comes up there's a non GK at keeper is sheer coincidence (several dozen times???) or b) there's been a change in the game.
Have a nice day. I hope things get better for you. It must really suck to have to live with your attitude.