Quote Originally Posted by Razz View Post
I CAN post screenshots from last week, from a game I watched.
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	I1.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	73.2 KB 
ID:	5737Click image for larger version. 

Name:	I2.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	85.0 KB 
ID:	5738Click image for larger version. 

Name:	I3.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	68.6 KB 
ID:	5739Click image for larger version. 

Name:	I4.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	73.9 KB 
ID:	5740
Again, this is a situation I have personally seen dozens of times, and others brpoght up in the illegal formation thread - an otherwise legal formation, with 80/20 possession. Invariably there's a non-GK playing keeper. Does that matter to you? No. Because after all, I'm just "making things up", right?

If a non-GK at keeper is not the reason for the possession penalty in the above case, and the dozens of others like it, then either a) there's some other explanation and the fact that every time it comes up there's a non GK at keeper is sheer coincidence (several dozen times???) or b) there's been a change in the game.

Have a nice day. I hope things get better for you. It must really suck to have to live with your attitude.
Razz, I am at season 5 and get the same finding as you have: if a team is at 20% possession and have a " legal" formation , I check who is playing goalkeeper and 100% of the time ... It's not a real GK... Hardo likes to argue with everybody, don't take it personally ... And he thinks he has the supreme knowledge!!!