8Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Normally, if you have a sub keeper and you're not present and you've set the keeper as "auto-sub" he'll come on. I wonder if I take that keeper off, I might be lucky enough to have a crooked keeper.
Normally, if you have a sub keeper and you're not present and you've set the keeper as "auto-sub" he'll come on. I wonder if I take that keeper off, I might be lucky enough to have a crooked keeper.
I've heard of this in connection with violation of the keeper. But I wonder how it hurt for 6 days and his team did not lose. That's why I wrote that it can report the problem
Mate, the injuries: frequency, length and cause are a constant cause of frustration to all managers.Originally Posted by nsretkovic
I've heard of this in connection with violation of the keeper. But I wonder how it hurt for 6 days and his team did not lose. That's why I wrote that it can report the problem
You wonder how he got a serious injury (6 days) and only one goal. We also wonder that, especially when it happens to our opponents and we have 70% possession and 19 shots and NOTHING goes in. Why does T11 not replace the GK IMMEDIATELY auto-sub or not and if there is no GK, auto-sub a DC or next best defender in and continue the game with a small penalty?
If I can come up with solutions that make sense, how is it that Nordeus cant do this? This isnt the MIT thinktank you know. We arent trying to find technology to land a man on the sun. This fix IS possible and should have been done long ago.
Again, this is not directed at you, but please pass this along to your masters at T11.
Reply With Quote
