Goalkeeper -> frustration

[khris]

I believe that GK is a cosmetic part in the game but sometimes specific players don't fit in a team.
As you didn't invest much in this player, buy and try some other.

Why cosmetic? If gk plays good, like get 8 often, then you concede less goals. If he gets often 6, then he is **** and you should replace him.
What i hear from niko, that almost all parts in this game are cosmetic. If combined with khris -- then internal programing cosmetic things

here I would say that there's a myth there, a old legend because it's dfficult to pay attention to a player that have a unique position, and that, is difficult to analyze the sense of his contribution in a way that, we can manage our team, in order to have Key player GK.

But, IMO... the same sensation we have with the Gk can be applied to the defense.... so, I believe thatthere's a sense there, and that, Gks, as a DC can be determinant if r well tested and used.

[iansyorkcityfc]

here I would say that there's a myth there, a old legend because it's dfficult to pay attention to a player that have a unique position, and that, is difficult to analyze the sense of his contribution in a way that, we can manage our team, in order to have Key player GK.

But, IMO... the same sensation we have with the Gk can be applied to the defense.... so, I believe thatthere's a sense there, and that, Gks, as a DC can be determinant if r well tested and used.

i never have problem with GK i just think GK is easiest way AI can blame a game being lost,i have seen a few times were DC player has been given bad revue by AM yet at same time been given MOM ???!!! just feel with a bit more imaginative programming by the DEV this anomaly could be removed or updated