Quote Originally Posted by Der_Ryan_M View Post
For me the wage is irrelevant anyway, the wage can be lower for example when someone bought this player with 50% and trained him to 59%, it is no indicator. Only the value and there it depends, in my own table it says 105.5M for FT 109 quality, but Niks table suggest 106M should be possible? You cannot know if he is 105.1M or 105.9M but it makes a big difference.
Thanks Ryan, but am looking via negotiations so all I am seeing is that 105M. He actually has 3 18 yr olds like that in his team. And if I can get them now, it will be cheaper than next season, I wish I could get a guarantee that they are fast trainers.

Sent from my SM-A720F using Tapatalk