Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: How did this happen?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Famous Morgan O'Bree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,622
    seems common in this season. I just won 0-3 away scoring only after 60' against a 1* team (q28) while i'm Q52,5 (55 main eleven). It's been like this for me for all the games i played so far.

  2. #2
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    354
    I don't worry about having the weaker team anymore, comes down to management and a Lil luck ;-)

  3. #3
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by hullabaloo View Post
    This is NOT a vent thread so spare me those tedious comments. I just want to know if anyone has any explanations as to HOW this is possible? For example, tactical explanations.

    My opponent was up 2-0 after 60 minutes and the possession was close to 50-50.
    He had 9 shots and I had only 5. He had 4 shots on target and I had 0.

    (I managed to score 3 goals after I changed my formation to a 4-5-1 V but that was AFTER 2-0)

    My questions is: How can such an inferior team shoot so much more than me, have so much possession AND lead 2-0 while continuously attacking?
    Shouldn't my superior players have managed to not get outplayed so easily?


    How did this happen?-hmmm.jpg
    Only thing I can tell you from that picture is the team on right should have a possession advantage because of 3 vs 2 in the middle.

    As for the rest, based on your description, your opponent was probably using hard attacking, thus generating more shots with less accuracy. I'm further guessing the team on the right is yours, because only a substantial quality difference (you neglected to tell us how 'inferior' his team is.) should score 3 goals with that formation against 3 central defenders.

    The team on the left effectively matched up 1 on 1 (attackers vs defenders) while the team on the right was effectively 1 vs 3 (attackers vs defenders). If the team on the left had moved a striker back to DMC or MC they'd have probably won easily.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  4. #4
    Grand Master PricopGeorgeCătălin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    12,976
    Is something normal to have results like this sometimes.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12