Did you know this???

[jklm_37]

Apple users get a unfair advantage over Android users.

Reason: Sponsorship arranged by Nordeous.

Explained: Apple users get to watch up to 5 videos a day which entitles them to either a health, morale or rest pack. Do the math. 5x7 days = 35 FREE packs per week.
Android users don't have this option.

Unfair? Yes!

Android users have to deal with injuries, low morale & playing 2 games a day with limited rest packs. Meanwhile Apple users can go watch a video or 5 & instantly heal or train a team & instantly bring them back up to full playing condition.

This NEEDS to be fixed! Now!

Agreed!!!...

I'm on Android as are probably many more and i didn't know about this...

seriously UNFAIR!!!!...

P.s..i refuse to buy apple...never have never will...

[Golden Boys FC]

P.s..i refuse to buy apple...never have never will...

Then until Nord change the structure of the program to support the facility of watching vids, you won't be able too, but then you would have known this prior to starting to play the game (possibly)

[jklm_37]

Then until Nord change the structure of the program to support the facility of watching vids, you won't be able too, but then you would have known this prior to starting to play the game (possibly)

Obviously ive only just learnt this...ive always preferred Windows or Android as opposed to being an apple fanboy lemming...

[Golden Boys FC]

Obviously ive only just learnt this...ive always preferred Windows or Android as opposed to being an apple fanboy lemming...

Windows and Android, that's so last year... And as for being an apple fanboy lemming, do you result to insults at school when you haven't got anything productive to add to a conversation? It's interesting that all the major companies offer to Apple users before android users don't you think? Says a lot really......

[Fragman]

It's interesting that all the major companies offer to Apple users before android users don't you think? Says a lot really......

Except it doesn't. iOS was the first smartphone class mobile operating system really introduced to the broad common-user market. So even three years after Android getting the bigger market penetration than iOS, currently at a rather astonishing 75% of smartphone sales, followed by iOS's 18-19%, providing an iOS app is considered "the first step" for many managements. This is also due to the fact, that out of all iOS users there's a higher percentage of those who install 3rd party apps at all compared to windows phone or android. Even though that trend is also on the decline.

So to summarize all this "lot" it says supposedly is in fact that most managers/service designers haven't really adapted their strategy for the current market situation.

[Golden Boys FC]

Except it doesn't. iOS was the first smartphone class mobile operating system really introduced to the broad common-user market. So even three years after Android getting the bigger market penetration than iOS, currently at a rather astonishing 75% of smartphone sales, followed by iOS's 18-19%, providing an iOS app is considered "the first step" for many managements. This is also due to the fact, that out of all iOS users there's a higher percentage of those who install 3rd party apps at all compared to windows phone or android. Even though that trend is also on the decline.

So to summarize all this "lot" it says supposedly is in fact that most managers/service designers haven't really adapted their strategy for the current market situation.

Whilst I follow your logic, can you point me to an Android phone (one single make/model) that currently achieves sales in excess of 18-19% of the total market, rather than the numerous makes/models that have jumped on the Android bandwagon and are scrapping around for the minimul market penetration that their brand and model can achieve.

Looking at the profits that the companies that the "managers/service designers" work for, I'd say that they have got their strategy spot on, and I can't see that changing anytime soon....

[Fragman]

Whilst I follow your logic, can you point me to an Android phone (one single make/model) that currently achieves sales in excess of 18-19% of the total market, rather than the numerous makes/models that have jumped on the Android bandwagon and are scrapping around for the minimul market penetration that their brand and model can achieve.

Tsk... ok fine, let's go there. The fact that you ask for a thing like that shows that you can't find an argument that sticks. This would be a riddiculously useless comparison. You have Apple on one side with one(!) phone released in 2012 against for example HTC (13 phone models released in 2012) or Samsung (19 phone models released in 2012).

So if there would be only one model among them which managed to get more than let's say 7% market share on it's own they would've done a terrible job. Because every company that doesn't have the benefit of a borderline-religious following (i.e. everyone except Apple) needs to design their products to appeal to all different kinds of user types. Because the decision whether to buy the phone is much more logical, more likely to be "oh, it's small. that's great 'cause it will consume less battery and will fit better in my small hands" rather than "omgosh it's an iPhone!".