I'm curious why the counter-formation for 3W-1-3W-1-2 happens to be: 3W-2(DMC)-3N-1-1 Tower, 3N-5-2 Flat
"3W-2(DMC)-3N-1-1 Tower" should be better by putting 4 in the back and taking out one DMC. "3N-5-2 Flat" seems like a more decent option, but I'm going to try a slight change by pushing the wide midfielders out to AML/AMR positions instead: 3(N)-3(MC)-2(AML/ARM)-2
Will post how it goes!![]()