Quote Originally Posted by July Fourth View Post
It's all down to difference of opinion and how we all play this game, I tend to disagree a lot with Pricop and there will be occasions where I will also disagree with Adel as well, We all have our own style of management, I normally tend to play around 4 different formations normally favouring having far superior team quality to my opponents, When Pricop may say attacking formation, I'm likely to say defend and counter.
I get that, it s a matter of preference but what is not making sense is: if formation and orders are that important , prico should not be that successful using his technic of same formation same orders no matter what ..... And if it does not matter then how come Adel our yourself could be successful? The only explanation is : there is no rationality the best team win period and because you all have very good team and are active you win most of the time and when you loose you try to find a rational explanation ... My formation or my orders were not the best one!! I am going to play more feeling and I will see if it s change anything as I was saying at the beginning .... I am confuse.