Quote Originally Posted by Rob1984 View Post
My team: 1-1 at home in CL vs weaker opponent playing 4-4-1-1-team.jpg
Result from match: 1-1 at home in CL vs weaker opponent playing 4-4-1-1-cl-1l.jpg
Possession was 63:37 in my favour.

So you think I should buy an ML just for this game?
(The current formation is designed for my next match, not the CL 2nd leg)
Well it depends - How important is it for you to win this specific game, and how much are you willing to spend? A ML is always good to have in your squad (My ML and MR are the scorekeepers). Also, I´m not an fan playing with AML-AMC-AMR formations (don´t see the benefits).

The formation that your proposing, makes you vulnerable in the middle and your opponent a great chance to play through the middle and/or down the flanks. But its up to you, I would buy a ML and try the 3-2-3-1-1 (DR-DC-DL-DMC x2-MR-MC-ML-AMC-ST) or 4-4-2 (classic) formation.