And I saying that, your win bonus at max, lets say you pay 12M? and his win bonus at max, lets say he pay 15M, give the same advantadge, because the bonus is divided in parts, one more expensive than the other, how more you pay higher is the benefit, but the max. benefit, is the same for a level 1 or a level 50, because the max. as Ive said can be a +6% possesion setting the bonus at max. level, you will pay less due your level, but, this win bonus, don't depend of -how much cost to set the bonus in max. level so $ vs $ .
Well is not something that comes from Nordeus, is just sharing experiences, and we can say that is not clear as some managers come here saying that win bonus sometimes go against and is better play without it...
My opinion, but, is that, this bonus give a little bit more of chances, too depending of the scenario, and make the performing of players more stable and with less surprises.
Of course, we are talking just of 1 of the 12-15 factors or more that have influence in the result, such as, condition, morale, agressivity, of course internal programming of players... win bonus, orders, Quality, attend and have the +8%, know how to read the scenario because the game want one doing one job, that is to manage, so the simulation is different if one attend or not, and then maybe "to manage" means that you have to substitute a player, or move this between lines, ... too there are now in the last version the 4 training bonuses....
so all is more extense, and as always I say, many players, come here, complaining because they think 1 star, or 2, should guarante a victory.
This is a fail, a wrong and personal fail, regarding the way to valorate what is the real differance in the simulation taking into account the stars, as Ive said many times, the distance in what a level of star can face another, is much bigger than what some expect. We see just 9* and inside a part of this 9 is the margin.