Very Strange, Abnormal Results Since 18/05/16 (Game Going 'Crazy')

[Perry Sih]

I don't know what you are complaining about here, but I remember Brazil lost to Germany 7-1 two years ago. This stuff happens.

And yes, the game engine changed in the previous update, when they added the "Association" thing. It was an extremely obvious change. I did go on a rough patch in the first few days, winning only one league game, but I figured it out after five days and ended the season with four wins and one draw.

The problem here is that the OP somehow thinks he has the "perfect" formation and that such "perfection" should last forever. Indeed, there was one type of formation that was more advantageous over others before the engine change, and it was obvious that Nordeus fixed it. The OP refused to adapt, thinking that money could buy his way to victory, and subsequently got burned.

The OP calls himself a "Tactician", yet he refuses to adapt to changes... That's extremely ironic. A true tactician should know that no tactic would last forever, and any gamer would surely know that things change all the time.

There was nothing to complain here. Adapt, or lose.

[Tactician]

I don't know what you are complaining about here, but I remember Brazil lost to Germany 7-1 two years ago. This stuff happens.

And yes, the game engine changed in the previous update, when they added the "Association" thing. It was an extremely obvious change. I did go on a rough patch in the first few days, winning only one league game, but I figured it out after five days and ended the season with four wins and one draw.

The problem here is that the OP somehow thinks he has the "perfect" formation and that such "perfection" should last forever. Indeed, there was one type of formation that was more advantageous over others before the engine change, and it was obvious that Nordeus fixed it. The OP refused to adapt, thinking that money could buy his way to victory, and subsequently got burned.

The OP calls himself a "Tactician", yet he refuses to adapt to changes... That's extremely ironic. A true tactician should know that no tactic would last forever, and any gamer would surely know that things change all the time.

There was nothing to complain here. Adapt, or lose.

What type of formation are you talking about? You neither watched those matches nor you know what tactics I have used and what formation and probable orders did each of those opposing teams used. You just came and made sarcastic comments. I don't use the same formation and orders for every match unless it is appropriate; I set my tactics according to the opponent. Do not generalise your case or the case of some other users here. I am not the type of manager that sticks to one type of formation or think there is a perfect formation or things like that, nor I am the type of manager that 'buys' victory.

'refused to adapt, thinking that money could buy his way to victory'

'OP somehow thinks he has the "perfect" formation and that such "perfection" should last forever'

'OP calls himself a "Tactician", yet he refuses to adapt to changes'

What nonsense are you talking about? You insinuated the opposite of what I do and what I think of concerning this game. This is annoying. You are wrong. Such sarcastic comments like yours are not welcomed here. When you don't know about someone, what is the situation and so on, you ask and do your own research, else you 'keep your mouth shut' instead of generalising your case, jumping to conclusions or talking '****'.

Also, do not compare this game to real life football or to past events in real life football; there is a big difference between the two.