4-4-2 Classic " is it unbeatable this season? "

[Pascha]

No it not unbeatable, I'm a lower level and lower average quality

is this from this season? your orders?

[meis]

just beaten it using 5-3-2

[John Tompkins]

is this from this season? your orders?

Yes, this season, hard attacking, mixed, hard tackling, whole pitch.

Blue arrows on players in own half, red arrows in opposing half

[John Tompkins]

look on the screen one of your opponent's forward had injury

No injury during the match

[dan1daking]

I always beat 4-4-2 with 4-5-1v ..

[ferr_ms]

I always beat 4-4-2 with 4-5-1v ..

tactic? arrows? pass? strong opponent or lite?

[dv8r]

Guys, stop saying X formation works when you won 1 or 2 games with it. Also, playing against a weak team doesn't really count because quality made the difference, not the formation.

I have tried most of the formations with a test team on another account against 4-4-2 with a similar quality and only 1 formation stood out. While 4-5-1v may work, it gives the opponent more chances because of the lack of wing coverage. So move the wingers to a ML/MR position and use a 4-1-4-1. I like to play mixed passing but you can experiment a little with the orders. At this moment in time, 4-1-4-1 is the best formation I can think of that can counter the 4-4-2. I've watched my friends use it and they succeed with said formation.

So I would like more people to try 4-1-4-1 with attacking tactics, mixed passing and red arrows on ML/MR and ST and show their results. It's pretty much how I play it but if you want to change the orders then feel free You won't win 100% of the time but you can win the majority of your games.

Recently I was a bit unlucky against a 4-4-2 when I used 4-1-4-1 and got a 3-3 result, it was the only time that I have struggled against it with the formation and I'm pretty sure it was a one-off.

[Cat Harrison]

I will try this for sure. Thanks.

[budking0228]

Guys, stop saying X formation works when you won 1 or 2 games with it. Also, playing against a weak team doesn't really count because quality made the difference, not the formation.

I have tried most of the formations with a test team on another account against 4-4-2 with a similar quality and only 1 formation stood out. While 4-5-1v may work, it gives the opponent more chances because of the lack of wing coverage. So move the wingers to a ML/MR position and use a 4-1-4-1. I like to play mixed passing but you can experiment a little with the orders. At this moment in time, 4-1-4-1 is the best formation I can think of that can counter the 4-4-2. I've watched my friends use it and they succeed with said formation.

So I would like more people to try 4-1-4-1 with attacking tactics, mixed passing and red arrows on ML/MR and ST and show their results. It's pretty much how I play it but if you want to change the orders then feel free You won't win 100% of the time but you can win the majority of your games.

Recently I was a bit unlucky against a 4-4-2 when I used 4-1-4-1 and got a 3-3 result, it was the only time that I have struggled against it with the formation and I'm pretty sure it was a one-off.

Hi dv8r,

I tried these tactics against a slightly lower 4-4-2 team 66.4 vs his 63.8 and I lost 3-1. I played the match attacking with mixed mixed focus and mixed passing with red arrows on the ML/MR and ST. Just wanted to post my results for the game that I had, have another game later today vs the same 4-4-2.

[marr]

dv8r i tried with your orders, red arrows on ml, mr and st.