Page 16 of 122 FirstFirst ... 614151617182666116 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 1236
Like Tree173Likes

Thread: Table of Counter Formations - What to use?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    VIP July Fourth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    15,386
    Quote Originally Posted by zidaldo View Post
    There's a great counter formation for the 4 2 3W 1 tactic

    As you can see :

    Table of Counter Formations - What to use?-442vs4321.jpg

    This is not one of my match, it was a game in my league but i used to play 4-4-2 vs 4-3-2W-1 too and it alway works so well!!! For me it's probably one of the most efficient counter combination.

    This 4-4-2 must be Defensive, attacking both flank, mixed passing, counter ON, no offside... with up arrows on MR and ML
    Thats a funny outcome on this game because isnt the 4-2-3W-1 supposed to be the successor to the 4-4-2 classic IRL?
    *Retired From Top Eleven*

  2. #2
    VIP dv8r's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,402
    I have quite a tough match tomorrow.. He plays 3N-2W-3N-1-1

    A slight variation from the 3-2-3-2 but with an AMC tucked behind the ST... So if 4-4-2 can beat 3-2-3-2 then I'm assuming the 4-1-4-1 can beat the above formation?
    July Fourth likes this.


    Season 15 - Level 15

    League Winners (14) - Levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    26-0-0 league (4) - Levels 3, 4, 7 & 8
    Undefeated in league (11) - Levels 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14
    Cup winners (2) - Level 1 & 14
    Cup 3rd place (1) - Level 12
    Champions League Winners (10) - Levels 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    Champions League Runners up(1) - Level 9






    >My team<

  3. #3
    VIP July Fourth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    15,386
    Quote Originally Posted by dv8r View Post
    I have quite a tough match tomorrow.. He plays 3N-2W-3N-1-1

    A slight variation from the 3-2-3-2 but with an AMC tucked behind the ST... So if 4-4-2 can beat 3-2-3-2 then I'm assuming the 4-1-4-1 can beat the above formation?
    Yes I would probably say your right or the 4-4-2 would still do the trick.
    *Retired From Top Eleven*

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by July Fourth View Post
    Thats a funny outcome on this game because isnt the 4-2-3W-1 supposed to be the successor to the 4-4-2 classic IRL?
    It is? really?

    We see that!

  5. #5
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    67
    Which formation is best versus 4-5-1 V ?

    Can I play like below?

    -------ST
    ------AMC
    ---MC- MC MC
    DML --------DMR
    ---DC DC DC

  6. #6
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    64
    Check the other stickied thread for the 451 v style solution. I would swap your amc and one mc for aml and amr so you have 32221 butterfly. It's not one of the suggested solutions on that thread tho.

  7. #7
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    66
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob1984 View Post
    Check the other stickied thread for the 451 v style solution. I would swap your amc and one mc for aml and amr so you have 32221 butterfly. It's not one of the suggested solutions on that thread tho.
    I have beaten 451V with 352V (3N btw), and my lowbie club (using 451V) lost to a 352 flat.

  8. #8
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    64
    What's best vs 4-2n-1-2n-1?

    I know up front i should have aml, amr and one st. But what in defence and midfield? I need to exploit their lack of wingers, but it's really strong down the middle.

    3-2n-2n-2w-1 or 4-1n-2n-2w-1 (451v)? Or something else?
    Last edited by Rob1984; 02-16-2013 at 10:20 AM.

  9. #9
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    64
    Can anyone help me with the below? I lost against this formation, think I used 4-5-1V:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob1984 View Post
    What's best vs 4-2n-1-2n-1?

    I know up front i should have aml, amr and one st. But what in defence and midfield? I need to exploit their lack of wingers, but it's really strong down the middle.

    3-2n-2n-2w-1 or 4-1n-2n-2w-1 (451v)? Or something else?

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Kabul, Afghanistan, Afghanistan
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob1984 View Post
    Can anyone help me with the below? I lost against this formation, think I used 4-5-1V:
    how can i beat 5-3N-2 formation july..??