Results 1 to 10 of 1236
Like Tree173Likes

Thread: Table of Counter Formations - What to use?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    31
    Hi folks!


    My opponent for tomorrows match uses this formation:

    ---- ST ---- ST ----
    ---- ---- AMC ---- ----
    ---- MC ---- MC ----
    DML ---- DMC ---- DMR
    ---- DC ---- DC ----
    ---- ---- GK ---- ----

    It looks like 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond, but with DML/DMR intead of DL/DR.

    Do you have any experience with playing against such a formation?
    I think tou normally need 3 defenders in the back row, so I will see if this formation will break the rules and opponet will have only 20% of ball possesion. Since I have no experience (after more than 9 seasons) with playing against such a formation I will use 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond, because my team is got used to play in this formation. And we will see... but if you have any suggestions, you are wellcome

    Francesko

  2. #2
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Francesko901 View Post
    Hi folks!


    My opponent for tomorrows match uses this formation:

    ---- ST ---- ST ----
    ---- ---- AMC ---- ----
    ---- MC ---- MC ----
    DML ---- DMC ---- DMR
    ---- DC ---- DC ----
    ---- ---- GK ---- ----

    It looks like 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond, but with DML/DMR intead of DL/DR.

    Do you have any experience with playing against such a formation?
    I think tou normally need 3 defenders in the back row, so I will see if this formation will break the rules and opponet will have only 20% of ball possesion. Since I have no experience (after more than 9 seasons) with playing against such a formation I will use 4-1-2-1-2 Narrow Diamond, because my team is got used to play in this formation. And we will see... but if you have any suggestions, you are wellcome

    Francesko

    2 DC? u'll have 80% possetion, that's illegal formation as I know

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by JorJo View Post
    2 DC? u'll have 80% possetion, that's illegal formation as I know
    Yeah, I think so So I hope he will not change this formation. At least, it will be proof of formations rules

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by JorJo View Post
    2 DC? u'll have 80% possetion, that's illegal formation as I know
    OK, it looks you are completely right - that guy has played today's match with this formation, receives only 20% of possesion, and he has lost 0:4. So, I am afraid he will change this formation, but I am not afraid of playing against any formation

    Thanks for consulting this case,
    Francesko