Results 1 to 10 of 1236
Like Tree173Likes

Thread: Table of Counter Formations - What to use?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by blanco View Post
    and a Harder Challenge is to find an antidote for:

    -DL---DC---DR--
    ----DMC-DMC---
    ----MC---MC----
    -------AMC------
    ----ST----ST----

    Better skilled players tried to beat me with 4-2N-2W-2 or even ..... 3N-1-3W-3 and they also failed.....

    Who is good enough for this?

    Tip: I use short passing and though the middle

    I faced such team. By the way that team is currently on the 1-st position in my leaque.

    Yes there's again the big problem of T11. I notice the problem one more time !
    Teams playing centre-based formations goes better that teams playing flank-based formations.
    Guys from Nordeus You must do something with it !!!!!!!



    However I defeated this 3-2n-2-1-2 team. My offer is to play one of the following formations:

    DL(up) DC DC DR(up)
    ML(up) MC MC MR(up)
    ST ST attacking or normal formation, attack both flanks, mixed

    DL(up) DC DC DR(up)
    --- MC MC ---
    AML AMR
    ST ST attacking formation, attack both flanks, mixed

    --- DC DC DC ---
    DML(up) DMR(up)
    --- MC MC ---
    AML AMR
    ST normal formation or defencive, attack both flanks, mixed

    --- DC DC DC ---
    DML(up) DMR(up)
    --- MC ---
    AML AMR
    ST ST attacking formation, attack both flanks, mixed (use this formation if You are a better side)

    But any way don't even try to attack centre. As a rule such teams has good player in the middle

    Good luck !!!
    Last edited by yulyus; 04-02-2013 at 08:06 PM.

  2. #2
    Champion Ljepoje's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,955
    Quote Originally Posted by yulyus View Post
    i faced such team. By the way that team is currently on the 1-st position in my leaque.

    yes there's again the big problem of t11. I notice the problem one more time !
    Teams playing centre-based formations goes better that teams playing flank-based formations.
    Guys from nordeus you must do something with it !!!!!!!



    however i defeated this 3-2n-2-1-2 team. My offer is to play one of the following formations:

    Dl(up) dc dc dr(up)
    ml(up) mc mc mr(up)
    st st attacking or normal formation, attack both flanks, mixed

    dl(up) dc dc dr(up)
    --- mc mc ---
    aml amr
    st st attacking formation, attack both flanks, mixed

    --- dc dc dc ---
    dml(up) dmr(up)
    --- mc mc ---
    aml amr
    st normal formation or defencive, attack both flanks, mixed

    --- dc dc dc ---
    dml(up) dmr(up)
    --- mc ---
    aml amr
    st st attacking formation, attack both flanks, mixed (use this formation if you are a better side)

    but any way don't even try to attack centre. As a rule such teams has good player in the middle

    good luck !!!

    really?! Stop spamming dude!
    July Fourth likes this.
    PROUD MANAGER OF...
    ____________________***______________________


  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13
    What would be the best formation & tactic against:

    DR---DC---DL
    -----DM-----
    MR--MC-MC---
    -----AMC-----
    ---ST--ST---

    I need to fix a 2-0 loss, playing at home this time. My team is better and in the away game I had more shots on target. (I don't have DML,DMR,AMR,AML players)
    Last edited by Yasp0; 04-04-2013 at 01:51 PM.

  4. #4
    VIP July Fourth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    15,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Yasp0 View Post
    What would be the best formation & tactic against:

    DR---DC---DL
    -----DM-----
    MR--MC-MC---
    -----AMC-----
    ---ST--ST---

    I need to fix a 2-0 loss, playing at home this time. My team is better and in the away game I had more shots on target. (I don't have DML,DMR,AMR,AML players)
    This topic doesn't cover asymmetrical formations, sorry.
    *Retired From Top Eleven*