Table of Counter Formations - What to use?

[yulyus]

and a Harder Challenge is to find an antidote for:

-DL---DC---DR--
----DMC-DMC---
----MC---MC----
-------AMC------
----ST----ST----

Better skilled players tried to beat me with 4-2N-2W-2 or even ..... 3N-1-3W-3 and they also failed.....

Who is good enough for this?

Tip: I use short passing and though the middle

I faced such team. By the way that team is currently on the 1-st position in my leaque.

Yes there's again the big problem of T11. I notice the problem one more time !
Teams playing centre-based formations goes better that teams playing flank-based formations.
Guys from Nordeus You must do something with it !!!!!!!


However I defeated this 3-2n-2-1-2 team. My offer is to play one of the following formations:

DL(up) DC DC DR(up)
ML(up) MC MC MR(up)
ST ST attacking or normal formation, attack both flanks, mixed

DL(up) DC DC DR(up)
--- MC MC ---
AML AMR
ST ST attacking formation, attack both flanks, mixed

--- DC DC DC ---
DML(up) DMR(up)
--- MC MC ---
AML AMR
ST normal formation or defencive, attack both flanks, mixed

--- DC DC DC ---
DML(up) DMR(up)
--- MC ---
AML AMR
ST ST attacking formation, attack both flanks, mixed (use this formation if You are a better side)

But any way don't even try to attack centre. As a rule such teams has good player in the middle

Good luck !!!