Lost to a 4-3W-3 Discussion

[Chair City FC]

Today in a group stage C/L match My side lost 3-0

Opp. 21 quality, playing 4-3W-3

Me. 26 quality, playing 4-5-1 V

orders were

Attack
Mixed
Own
Normal
Mixed
Zonal
Force C/A

open for discussion, Thank You

[RJSlow]

4-5-1 v style is good against 4-3n-3. he probably covered his flanks

[John Naish]

RJ, he said 4-3W-3

[RJSlow]

RJ, he said 4-3W-3

I know, im saying that i would not of used 4-5-1 v style against 3w, I would use it for 3N. So he probably used his ML and MR with blue arrows and covered his flanks

[Chris Rath]

4-5-1 v style is good against 4-3n-3.

Not always, it depends on the orders.

[RJSlow]

Not always, it depends on the orders.

True but with the right orders it works well, which is what i am saying

[Dman2pt]

For my experience, against 3W midfielders is always Best to use also 3W or 5 flat.

[Chair City FC]

I posted the orders. Only thing I would have done different is set to up both flanks.

Attack
Mixed
Own
Normal
Mixed
Zonal
Force C/A

What confuses me is. I played against a higher quality side. who was using a 4-4-2. and won the match 3-1 the night before ..

[Chair City FC]

For my experience, against 3W midfielders is always Best to use also 3W or 5 flat.

So your saying a 4-5-1 or 3-5-2.. red arrows on wingers?

[Dman2pt]

So your saying a 4-5-1 or 3-5-2.. red arrows on wingers?

I prefere to use 3151 with red arrows on the MCs without opponent, that way they can work more as false AMCs, since they have no one marking them.