
Originally Posted by
LeManiaque
You've been tracking it, so what's the data? That's more reliable than a bunch of us who don't track it giving opinions.
You tracked games, and win-draw-loss totals for the games you did and did not adjust later than 15 minutes to match time were _____.
IRL, how many changes were made to starting 11 is a frequent point of discussion (or contention) especially when things don't go as planned. Some formula to mimic that wouldn't be dodgy, per se.
Personally, I've had both ways, heavy training killing a rating, or not affecting at all. Same if the star rating has increased ffor the player.
Edit: if you think it's "likely" that results are predetermined to any degree, can you answer, practically speaking, why Nordeus would do that? They almost certainly have server and cloud processing on demand, and the formulas used for non-graphical calculations, those behind the stats and goals and events, are almost certainly approaching inconsequential for those kinds of processors. It's not hours long physics modeling calculations. So what's the advantage to processing this ahead of time? We can see visisual changes during the game, so they're calculating some data on the fly... Why not all of it... Like most programs...