Training and Counter-Formation Tutorial

[ahmadowskianaya]

3DC's?and he have strong 2ST's??

[ahmadowskianaya]

what about 4-1-3N-2?

[sdw]

Butterfly - 3 DC,DML and DMR,2 MC's,AML and AMR,one ST.Attack him from the flanks.He doesn't have chances even he's more stronger than you.4-1-3N-2 is the easiest formation to counter.

[LesterMind]

Great job.

Using your phillosophy about counter formations, I am trying to imagine which formation would be more effective to fight against next formation.....

DR---DC---DL
-----DMC----
MR---MC---ML
---AMC-AMC--
------ST-----

(reverse)

------ST------
---AMC-AMC--
ML---MC---MR
-----DMC-----
DL---DC---DR
(-----GK-----)
Maybe it can be called a (christmas) tree.

Allways supossing could be using attacking arrows for middlewings.

Any suggestion from you?
My suggestion trying to use your phillosphy as I understand, could be next ones...
having not any MR and not any DMR at my list players (I have for the others positions)

with 3 strikers...

--ST-ST-ST--
--------------
---MC--MC---
---DMC-DMC-
DL---DC---DR
with red arrows for wingsbacks?

or better...

with 2 strikers

---ST---ST--
--AMC-AMC--
-----MC-----
--DMC-DMC--
DR---DC---DL
and again red arrows?

or...

---ST---ST---
--------------
ML---MC---(MR) (dont have MR but may be using it excepcionally)
--DMC-DMC---
--DC-DC-DC--

red arrows for middelwingers?

or just enought 1 st with 2 amc maybe like this...

------ST------
--AMC--AMC--
ML---MC---(MR)
--DMC--DMC--
--DC-DC-DC-- (or DL---DC---DR)

red arrows at middlewingers?

Some of these looks like a tree as well.

Thank you if still are answering at this thread.

Cheers.

[Pedro Felipe Oliveira]

Guys.
I have a decisive match in the UCL Final.
My opponent has:

DL DC DC DR
DMC
ML MC MR
ST ST

How can I beat him? The teams are in the same level.

[Master Tactician]

Great job.

Using your phillosophy about counter formations, I am trying to imagine which formation would be more effective to fight against next formation.....

DR---DC---DL
-----DMC----
MR---MC---ML
---AMC-AMC--
------ST-----

(reverse)

------ST------
---AMC-AMC--
ML---MC---MR
-----DMC-----
DL---DC---DR
(-----GK-----)
Maybe it can be called a (christmas) tree.

Allways supossing could be using attacking arrows for middlewings.

Any suggestion from you?
My suggestion trying to use your phillosphy as I understand, could be next ones...
having not any MR and not any DMR at my list players (I have for the others positions)

with 3 strikers...

--ST-ST-ST--
--------------
---MC--MC---
---DMC-DMC-
DL---DC---DR
with red arrows for wingsbacks?

or better...

with 2 strikers

---ST---ST--
--AMC-AMC--
-----MC-----
--DMC-DMC--
DR---DC---DL
and again red arrows?

or...

---ST---ST---
--------------
ML---MC---(MR) (dont have MR but may be using it excepcionally)
--DMC-DMC---
--DC-DC-DC--

red arrows for middelwingers?

or just enought 1 st with 2 amc maybe like this...

------ST------
--AMC--AMC--
ML---MC---(MR)
--DMC--DMC--
--DC-DC-DC-- (or DL---DC---DR)

red arrows at middlewingers?

Some of these looks like a tree as well.

Thank you if still are answering at this thread.

Cheers.

i think that the main weakness is the wide defensive line. Therefore I would go 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1 or 4-2-3-1 (narrow AMs).

[misterr]

Hi guys !
I also have a FINAL today against a team with this tactic:

DR--DC--DC--DL
------DMC------
---MC-MC-MC---
------AMC------
-------ST-------

I have a slightly higher team quality, but we're both 5*.
What would you play ?

[Lasike]

Hi do you think that is there any difference (i mean chemistry ) if you play the same formation all the time..or you change it very often.
and second question im gonna play against stronger opponent wich is playing 413W2 what formation do you thing i should play ? thank you ! (i was thinking about 3W3W2AML,AMR2)

[Radu Nedelcu]

how can i beat 4-3W-1-2 is 4-1-4-1 good ?

[sdw]

how can i beat 4-3W-1-2 is 4-1-4-1 good ?

No,you'll stop his attack but you'll hardly score.Use 3N-3(DML/DMR/DMC)-2-1-1