Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: Punishing the manager who doesn't attend 50% of his games

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Grand Master PricopGeorgeCătălin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    12,976
    Those online managers are already rewarded with extra possession and an extra pack, plus ability to do changes regarding tactic, formation, players and so on.

    Your ideas are quite drastic but also very unpractical on a large scale. This update will clearly make lots of managers mad and just as somebody pointed above, what if somebody don't have internet, or they have a different life event that requires their time, either a party or job, during their sleeping time, etc?
    Neno likes this.
    Orlova FC - onForum - LIKE Orlova FC - onYoutube - SUBSCRIBE Orlova FC - onFacebook

  2. #2
    Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    879
    Quote Originally Posted by PricopGeorgeCătălin View Post
    Your ideas are quite drastic but also very unpractical on a large scale. This update will clearly make lots of managers mad and just as somebody pointed above, what if somebody don't have internet, or they have a different life event that requires their time, either a party or job, during their sleeping time, etc?
    Okay let's put aside the idea of punishing managers who have a valid reason for not watching some of their game as you have said ...

    The title of my topic was punishing managers who don't attend 50% of the games. thousands of managers fail to watch 50%-75% of their games and continue to promote or at least tank and become more powerful ... should this issue continue without intervention or should Nordeus take certain measures against them ?
    Doors FC likes this.

  3. #3
    Grand Master PricopGeorgeCătălin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    12,976
    Quote Originally Posted by USARABAT View Post
    Okay let's put aside the idea of punishing managers who have a valid reason for not watching some of their game as you have said ...

    The title of my topic was punishing managers who don't attend 50% of the games. thousands of managers fail to watch 50%-75% of their games and continue to promote or at least tank and become more powerful ... should this issue continue without intervention or should Nordeus take certain measures against them ?
    I am not watching my games as I don't think is necessary but I don't think or count myself as an inactive manager. I do log in every day, take care of formation, tactic, condition, moral and so on. Punishing me for what reason? Some of the managers have their games at some very unusual hours so would be very hard for them to watch their games.

    Even in my case for example, most of my games are at the time I am at work so why should I be punished?

    As I've said above, being online at the game is already a bonus for you: extra pack/packs , ability to control better the game, better possession and so on.
    Orlova FC - onForum - LIKE Orlova FC - onYoutube - SUBSCRIBE Orlova FC - onFacebook

  4. #4
    Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    879
    Quote Originally Posted by PricopGeorgeCătălin View Post
    I am not watching my games as I don't think is necessary


    That's what many managers are doing as well because unfortunately the unfair system made them feel so due to the absence of penalties

    I wonder why T.E. label itself as an online F. management game

  5. #5
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by USARABAT View Post
    The punishment can take one or more faces

    A- Deduction of points from league competition which leads to losing ranks and sometimes relegation
    B- Deduction of tokens and/ or money


    Another drastic suggestion

    C- Making the manager who doesn't attend a match lose 3-0 and if both managers didn't show up the match result ends by 0-0
    That's pretty tone deaf, mate. People have jobs, children, etc. The game can't punish you for not being your priority.
    Temidayo_ likes this.

  6. #6
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    49
    If the game lets players reschedule each home match once without tokens, then make players pay 4 tokens to do any further rescheduling.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Ultimate Club
    Season 8 - Level 6 League, Level 6 Cup

    Let's fight to make Top Eleven better!

  7. #7
    Addicted
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    518
    guys you keep saying its not fair.USARABAT suggests to punish managers not active.no punishment for not supporting 1-2-10 matches.punishment for not being active half or full seasons.
    not being online in your matches doesnt mean your not active.

  8. #8
    Apprentice John Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    190
    If this idea was changed to punish managers (somehow , I know there is a very minor punishment now which really is a pittance once you get past level 10) who dont even log in each day then you might get some traction with people. The fact of the matter is these are the people who dont care and maybe should have sanctions against them and not those who do log in every day , train players etc but for whatever reason cant attend 50% or more of games. Myself , due to timezones the best I can do is maybe 60%. From that 60% we lose maybe 10-15% due to work and other rl issues so I am now down to or past the 50% threshold that you suggest but I log in each day , collect my crap , train my players , study opposition etc all of which takes over 3 hours every day ( 5 teams currently) which is probably more of a daily time investment than than most I would guess. Besides my teams seem to do pretty well without me watching every game , maybe they would do better if I watched all the time , maybe not as suggested by other posters.

    Now I am really wondering what is your problem , what caused you to post this idea in the first place. It seems you didnt think it through so I might assume you lost to a team that had an absent manager and in a fit of pique started this thread. In that case I can understand your frustration and hence this thread.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123