FAs AVQ Counting System Change

[khris]

I'm gonna suggest to stop stupid manipulations as the one I did unintentionally today ( I had a 103 avq formation and Im gonna face a 108 when I really have 150%)

-to count only the first 5-6 or, max. 7 stars in the simulation. This means to cut intentionally the avq individually in the skills when these reach 100% (6*) or 120% -7*- as example and have a competition with it's own calibration during the live simulations, if I'm right it is a separated feature, and I believe that can be done like this without so many complications (lol).

So tank would have no sense cause with a market at 5* a player with 120% skills would be equal vs one of 160%.

This can seem like the actual challanges that have a high margin of beatability but the fact is that doing a "cut" in the 120% of the skills the situation during the simulation would be another, without the decalibrations related with the high beatabilitymargin and the internal skills would have more weight during the simulation.

wikiwiki^^

[Altiplano]

Why limit this idea to Associations only? Why not an average of the best 5/6 players for all draws, league and cups too.
Ok. I haven't thought this through thoroughly, but wouldn't it have the same effect as you suggested on tanking and at the same time make draw manipulation harder?

[maloukees]

For best the average quality of the best 11 players

[nikolgiorgos]

I'm gonna suggest to stop stupid manipulations as the one I did unintentionally today

Indeed it was a stupid manipulation because our group didn't earn anything from this
You had an easier opponent but Adrian or Beck had more difficult opponents for their quality.
This is a known issue that the draw of the groups is based at the current 11 squad the teams have at 07.30 GMT of Friday (or Thursday the last week).
I think it was broken when they tried to change the quality view of a team some months ago.
Before that the, draw of the pairs was based in the top11 or 14 q players of the roster no matter if they were in the first squad or in the bench.
There is a relative suggestion about fixing that.

The quality manipulation of (mostly) the platinum groups (or those who aim for this) is
- To go with a very weak team (1*-2*) and after the draw start buying 5* players from the market
- To have a fake team with 1* (or minus) players with other 5 strong teams so to drop the general quality of the group .
The 5 strong teams have easier opponents and the week team has a strong for his q - but it's a 15-3 points.

Unfortunately you can't do anything about those cases (as TE continue using the top100 as the vitrine of the game).

[Doors FC]

how about the average between your 2nd(or 3rd) best player and your lowest player?only these 2 players.
*not 1st(or 2nd)so nordeus may potentially earn some money from us buying extreme star players.

[nikolgiorgos]

no, I have a player -8* (yes, -).
He is an old 0t academy player I have for many seasons.

[IImaestroII]

Unfortunately you can't do anything about those cases (as TE continue using the top100 as the vitrine of the game).

Sadly

[madflo19]

Look here a fair draw,none of their 6 teams have 1*players,no manipulation, just nordeus idiotic draw system.
2 6* associations against 2 7* associations, and guess what ...the 2 6* associations needs around 50 points to stay in platinum,the 2 7* associations have a safe spot in platinum already..
Accidentally?i don't think so...
We are 8-8 1st round, i bet the 2nd round they will win easy..

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk