Youth Academy, aka Useless academy (haha)

[TheWhiteKirby]

I disagree about loaning, i think it can be done well. Think about it. To afford a loan you must pay a fee, I would make it a token fee, and you must afford their weekly wages. If we can loan at max 3 league levels under you (so a club lv 35 cant loan to a club lv 1 or 2), it would be perfect. There is a HUGE difference in wages of a 5 or 6 star player at league lv 8 than one at league lv 11 or 10. A loan that is basically buying a good player would feel just like that. A loss of tokens and money. And because of stars a 5 star lv at league 8 is a 2 star player at leage lv 11, perfect time to loan your late twenties 3rd choice players and maybe they return with some life and help the team. If they didnt improve you can offer a permanent switch so that team can continue to use them for as long as they want. It wouldnt be broken, wouldnt require too many restrictions. And i know they did it before with associations but im talking league only.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[po_zdrach]

I disagree about loaning, i think it can be done well. Think about it. To afford a loan you must pay a fee, I would make it a token fee, and you must afford their weekly wages. If we can loan at max 3 league levels under you (so a club lv 35 cant loan to a club lv 1 or 2), it would be perfect. There is a HUGE difference in wages of a 5 or 6 star player at league lv 8 than one at league lv 11 or 10. A loan that is basically buying a good player would feel just like that. A loss of tokens and money. And because of stars a 5 star lv at league 8 is a 2 star player at leage lv 11, perfect time to loan your late twenties 3rd choice players and maybe they return with some life and help the team. If they didnt improve you can offer a permanent switch so that team can continue to use them for as long as they want. It wouldnt be broken, wouldnt require too many restrictions. And i know they did it before with associations but im talking league only.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

How many tokens supposed to pay for loan player? What quality will be maximum? Because if you can pay 2 tokens for 9 stars player, manipulation for this will be borderless.

[TheWhiteKirby]

Obviously not two tokens for 9* players. Most likely a season-long loan for a 9* star player would be around 25-30 tokens PLUS paying their weekly wages and a loan fee like in real life. Like I said- it would be an option but not an exploit. A 5* star player could have a loan fee of like 7-9 tokens, some millions depending on league level and their weekly wages. Just like in actual football, depending on the quality of player, it is sometimes cheaper to buy a player of less quality than loan a player of extraordinary quality.

[Kelpie Grant]

I disagree about loaning, i think it can be done well. Think about it. To afford a loan you must pay a fee, I would make it a token fee, and you must afford their weekly wages. If we can loan at max 3 league levels under you (so a club lv 35 cant loan to a club lv 1 or 2), it would be perfect. There is a HUGE difference in wages of a 5 or 6 star player at league lv 8 than one at league lv 11 or 10. A loan that is basically buying a good player would feel just like that. A loss of tokens and money. And because of stars a 5 star lv at league 8 is a 2 star player at leage lv 11, perfect time to loan your late twenties 3rd choice players and maybe they return with some life and help the team. If they didnt improve you can offer a permanent switch so that team can continue to use them for as long as they want. It wouldnt be broken, wouldnt require too many restrictions. And i know they did it before with associations but im talking league only.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Cant work because it wont work because......................human nature. Isnt there enough manipulation and outright cheating already in this game without gift wrapping the perfect manipulation tool to these same people ?